TITLE

Permit violators serve hard time

AUTHOR(S)
Shanoff, Barry
PUB. DATE
October 1997
SOURCE
World Wastes;Oct97, Vol. 40 Issue 10, p94
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Comments on a federal appeals court's affirmation of the convictions of slaughterhouse employees Thomas J. Sinskey and Wayne Kumm for knowingly violating the Clean Water Act of the United States. Roles in a scheme to make it appear that discharges from a South Dakota meat packing plant did not exceed limits in the facility's wastewater discharge permit; Contaminated wastewater created by the meat-packing process.
ACCESSION #
9711021004

 

Related Articles

  • Baltimore hit with federal suit. Wright, Andrew G. // ENR: Engineering News-Record;01/12/98, Vol. 240 Issue 2, p20 

    Reports that in December 1997, federal regulators filed a lawsuit against the city of Baltimore, Maryland, for allegedly polluting Chesapeake Bay tributaries with discharges from two municipal water and wastewater treatment plants. Suit filed by the Justice Department and Maryland Attorney...

  • Georgia, congested Georgia: Sierra Club files lawsuit to stop highway projects. Wilson, Bill // Roads & Bridges;Jun99, Vol. 37 Issue 6, p18 

    Focuses on the lawsuit filed by Sierra Club against highway projects at the Department of Transportation in Georgia. Claims of Sierra Club on environmental act violation of the project; Issues on funding of transportation projects; Opponents of Sierra Club about the case; Views on...

  • Getting busy: Corporate issues in the early stages of criminal environmental investigations. Baker, Debra; Cason, Bill // Journal of Corporation Law;Spring97, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p411 

    Identifies the types of strategic issues that companies and their counsel should consider during any pre-indictment investigation for alleged environmental crimes. Ability of the government to contact company employees during the pre-indictment stage; Need to provide employees with their own...

  • Standing for the environment. Carlson, Ann E. // UCLA Law Review;Apr98, Vol. 45 Issue 4, p931 

    Discusses standing rules in environmental cases in the United States. Standing and the evolution of the injury-in-fact standard; Environmental organizations' inattention to human harm; Philosophical views of the standing inquiry; Case study of the human-centered environmental litigation.

  • Trials begin for utilities. Truini, Joe // Waste News;2/17/2003, Vol. 8 Issue 23, p1 

    Reports on the trials against U.S.-based utility companies over alleged violations of the Clean Air Act. Law suit against a division of FirstEnergy Corp. on failure to install additional pollution controls at the W.H. Sammis power plant; Argument on operation of the plant under emission...

  • AGAINST `GREEN' CRIMINOLOGY. Halsey, Mark // British Journal of Criminology;Nov2004, Vol. 44 Issue 6, p833 

    This article offers an overview of recent work on environmental crime and regulation. It demonstrated the majority of such scholarship is imbued by quite Problematic ideas concerning how best to envisage the nature of environmental harm and the type of regulatory structures which should be...

  • Seismic change in the regulatory landscape. Colvin, Simon // Utility Week;3/26/2010, Vol. 32 Issue 11, p14 

    The article discusses the British government's plan to implement the Environmental Sanctions Order 2010 (ECSO), and the Environmental Sanctions Regulations 2010 on April 6, 2010. Under the ECSO, environmental regulators will be given a civil penalty toolkit to impose on businesses and the...

  • Prima Asphalt Concrete, Spitzer reach settlement. Mancini, Rosamaria // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);8/30/2002, Vol. 49 Issue 36, p13A 

    Reports on the settlement of the suit filed by the Long Island residents against Prima Asphalt Concrete in Long Island, New York. Amount of the punitive damages paid by Prima Asphalt; Agreement of the company to review its engineering report; Compliance of the company to the construction...

  • Building Trouble.  // India Today;1/31/2011, p38 

    The article reports that criminal proceedings have been initiated against Hiranandani Group co-founder Niranjan Hiranandani and his family for flouting environmental norms in their power project near Pune, India, after the declaring the order to demolish the Adarsh Society building and the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics