NHS cash boost safe with Labour

December 1996
Public Finance;12/06/96, p5
Trade Publication
Reports on the promise of the Labour party to match the extra funding the British government has pledged for the National Health Service in 1997. Amount to be released by the Labour party; Doubt on the ability of longer term contracts to produce large savings.


Related Articles

  • Opinion: The myth of an NHS safe in Labour's hands. Farrell, Liam // GP: General Practitioner;5/28/2010, p26 

    In this article the author comments on the services provided by Great Britain's National Health Service (NHS). He presents a fictitious circumstances involving vetenary treatment provided to a lemming. He provides a humorous account of a conversation between the animal treated and the doctor. He...

  • Is Labour still the party for the NHS? Wild, Sarah // Independent Nurse;10/5/2009, p16 

    In this article, the author hopes that the British Labour Party's commitment to create a National Care Service that will provide free care to the elderly in their own homes will not be forgotten in the dash for crowd-pleasing policies that have not been thoroughly studied in terms of its...

  • For whom the bell tolls. Hughes, Geoffrey // Emergency Medicine Journal;Mar2007, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p150 

    The author discusses the changes in the National Health Service (NHS) in Great Britain under the Labour Government. He states that performance targets and payment by results have been introduced to improve standards and develop competition within the NHS and independent providers. He argues that...

  • Labour's NHS reforms 'have not borne fruit'.  // Independent Nurse;6/16/2008, p4 

    The article focuses on the National Health Service (NHS) system of the Labour government in Great Britain. The public sector believes that the system has thus far been ineffective. A report by the Healthcare Commission and the Audit Commission states the patients need to have more realistic...

  • Independent Nurse: Opinion - Online.  // GP: General Practitioner;10/23/2009, p19 

    The author comments on several aspects related to health care in Great Britain. The author questions the ability of Labour Party in handling the National Health Service (NHS) of Great Britain, as the party itself has a history of costly and ineffective management, broken promises, and...

  • Chris Lancelot on… CHUCHKING OUT THE RULE BOOK. Lancelot, Chris // GP: General Practitioner;12/1/2006, p25 

    The article focuses on the views of the author on the rules and regulations of Great Britain's National Health Service (NHS). Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt has accepted that NHS output has not risen despite the additional annual £48 billion spent on it by the Labour Party. Contrary to...

  • Tory medicine quietens the NHS. Dickson, Niall; Lansley, Stewart // New Statesman;9/6/96, Vol. 125 Issue 4299, p28 

    Focuses on the British Labour Party's policy towards public health. Criticisms to the National Health Service (NHS); Funding issues; Labour's claim that the Tories have mishandled the NHS.

  • the politics column. Bright, Martin // New Statesman;4/3/2006, Vol. 135 Issue 4786, p10 

    In this article the author reports on the state of government-funded healthcare in Great Britain in 2006. Findings by three healthcare agencies have found that the elderly are not well served under the National Health Service. The author recalls that he led a campaign to assist the elderly in...

  • Labour's "reforms" destroying the NHS. Pilger, John // New Statesman;11/5/2007, Vol. 136 Issue 4869, p24 

    In this article the author declares that the British Labour Party, under prime minister Gordon Brown, was in the process of doing irreparable damage to the National Health Service (NHS) in 2007. He accuses the government of gradual privatization of the service and claims that a financial crisis...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics