TITLE

Untitled

PUB. DATE
November 1996
SOURCE
People Management;11/7/1996, Vol. 2 Issue 22, p11
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents a photograph of the panel members at the conference's Question Time, where Sir John Harvey-Jones stressed that ethical behaviour meant good business. Comment of Sue Slipman, director of the Gas Consumer Council on ethical behaviors of businessmen; Chairman of the session.
ACCESSION #
9710286049

 

Related Articles

  • Kripke's normativity argument. Zalabardo, Jose L. // Canadian Journal of Philosophy;Dec97, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p467 

    Presents a paper which questioned the consensus on how Kripke's argument on normativity in linguistic expression should be interpreted. Views on how Kripke's normativity argument should be constructed; Information on the standard normativity argument.

  • RATIO VERSUS IRRATIO? Krupa, Viktor // Dialogue & Universalism;2002, Vol. 12 Issue 8/10, p121 

    Many of the key events and turns typical of the second half of the twentieth century have shattered the faith in the linear and undisturbed progress of mankind. These doubts have often been interpreted as a large-scale failure of rationalism. Instead of substituting irrationalism for rationalism...

  • Alternatives in Jewish Theology. Breslauer, S. Daniel // Judaism;Spring81, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p233 

    Analyzes the types of Jewish theology. Differentiation between normative and responsive theology; Details on contemporary writers of Jewish theology belonging to normative theology; Value of responsive theology of individual in the normative theology of the group.

  • Incommensurable goods, rightful lies, and the wrongness of fraud. Strudler, Alan // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Jun98, Vol. 146 Issue 5, p1529 

    Examines some of the apparent tensions between legal and moral responses to lying. Lessons about the normative structure of justifiable judgments about truth-telling; Concept of incommensurability and some of the limits that confront an analysis of normative problems; Discussion of a...

  • How to Distinguish Good and Bad Arguments: Dialogico-Rhetorical Normativity. Slob, Wouter H. // Argumentation;2002, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p179 

    Deductivism is not merely a logical technique, but also a theory of normativity: it provides an objective and universal standard of evaluation. Contemporary dialectical logic rejects deductive normativity, replacing its universal standard by an intersubjective standard. It is argued in this...

  • Doing Good by Staying In? Dobel, J. Patrick // Public Personnel Management;Summer82, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p126 

    Focuses on the ethical justification for continued participation in the government. Legitimization of ethical justifications; Moral responsibility in an unacceptable policies; Conditions of making the justifications for staying in a sound one.

  • The incoherence argument: reply to Schafer-Landau. Smith, Michael // Analysis;Jul2001, Vol. 61 Issue 3, p254 

    Deliberates Russ-Schafer-Landau's argument regarding moral judgement and normative reasons. Comments on the presentation of the argument; Focuses on the practicality requirement on moral judgement.

  • INTRODUCTION: KANTIAN ASPECTS OF PRACTICAL NORMATIVITY. Baiasu, Sorin // Politics & Ethics Review;2007, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p1 

    The article discusses a report published within the issue that includes Fabienne Peter's contribution concerning practical normativity.

  • Normative Supervenience and Consequentialism. Bykvist, Krister // Utilitas;Mar2003, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p27 

    Act-consequentialism is usually taken to be the view that we ought to perform the act that will have the best consequences. But this definition ignores the possibility of various non-maximizing forms of act-consequentialism, e.g. satisficing theories that toll us to perform the act whose...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics