TITLE

Courtroom round-up

PUB. DATE
November 1995
SOURCE
People Management;11/2/1995, Vol. 1 Issue 22, p47
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on several legal cases handled by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Great Britain. WA Goold Limited versus McConnell; Tower Boot Company versus Jones; Ryford versus Drinkwater; Walters versus Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis.
ACCESSION #
9710246640

 

Related Articles

  • Brandford & Bingley v McCarthy.  // Employers Law;Mar/Apr2010, p9 

    The article discusses the bases of the British Employment Appeal Tribunal in deciding on the case Bradford and Bingley v. Mccarthy concerning employee dismissal.

  • EAT still playing catch-up despite new judges. Malkin, Brendan // Lawyer;10/14/2002, Vol. 16 Issue 41, p4 

    Reports on the Great Britain Department of Trade and Industry's decision to appoint six additional part-time judges to the Employment Appeal Tribunal. Problems of delay and backlog.

  • Competing while still employed.  // Accountancy;Sep92, Vol. 110 Issue 1189, p114 

    Reviews the decision of the British Employment Appeal Tribunal in the case 'Marshall v Industrial Systems and Control Ltd.' Reasonable action taken by the company in dismissing its managing director who was planning to set up in competition with the company while still employed.

  • The protectors. Ciumei, Charles // Lawyer;12/10/2001, Vol. 15 Issue 49, p25 

    Focuses on the decision of the British Employment Appeal Tribunal in the case Parkins v. Sodexho. Details of the case; Definition of interim relief; Significance of the Employment Rights Act.

  • Pornographic telephone calls.  // Accountancy;Dec1995, Vol. 116 Issue 1228, p105 

    Announces the British Employment Appeal Tribunal's decision that the dismissal of an employee who had made telephone calls from his office to pornographic entertainment numbers was fair. Defendant's decision not dispute the calls during a disciplinary hearing; Reasons given by the company for...

  • Case round-up. Willmott, Ben // Personnel Today;2/11/2003, p14 

    Focuses on decisions given by the Great Britain Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) in various hearings of unfair dismissal cases filed by employees. Decision for appropriate percentage of Polkey reduction in employees' compensation given by EAT in Market Place Ltd. versus Hunt case;...

  • Can you still discriminate against an ex-employee? Moore, Nicholas // Personnel Today;2/26/2002, p14 

    Focuses on the rulings of the Employment Appeal Tribunal on the discrimination of the past employees under Disability Discrimination Act. Victimization of employer; Relationship between Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and Race Relations Act 1976; Changes of law.

  • EAT backs police over compulsory retirement.  // Employee Benefits;10/1/2015, p6 

    The article reports on the filing of an appeal against an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision in the case of Harrod and others v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police that the right of police forces to compulsorily retire officers under a regulation is not age-discriminatory.

  • Put web misuse policies high on your priority list. Brahams, Gareth // Personnel Today;11/19/2002, p16 

    Discusses the ruling of the Employment Appeal Tribunal of Great Britain regarding the validity of the decision of the Hillingdon London Borough Council in London, England to dismiss an employee for accessing hard-core pornography from the internet. Factors distinguishing the misuse of computers...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics