Firms forced to consult about health matters

Thatcher, Mike
November 1995
People Management;11/2/1995, Vol. 1 Issue 22, p16
Reports on the ad hoc approach of the Great Britain government to workplace consultation with proposals requiring employers to consult their staff on health and safety issues. Rules outlined from the Health and Safety Commission; Reaction from the Trades Union Congress (TUC); Government's conversion to the cause of consultation.


Related Articles

  • Reduced inspection plan from OSHA. Barlas, Stephen // Underground Construction;Mar1998, Vol. 53 Issue 3, p12 

    Reports that the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration is offering a new program that provides a way for reducing the chances for a federal safety inspection in dangerous worksites. Requirements for meriting a chance to join the Cooperative Compliance Program.

  • The MCAA reports that a bill was introduced to the Senate.  // Contractor Magazine;Nov97, Vol. 44 Issue 11, p5 

    Reports that in the efforts to reduce Occupational Safety and Health fines, a bill was introduced to the Senate that would reform the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. What the bill allows Congress to do.

  • OSHA requires 8-hr reporting of fatalities.  // Textile World;May94, Vol. 144 Issue 5, p20 

    Reports on the Occupational Safety & Health Administration's (OSHA) issuance of a final rule requiring employers to orally report any occupational fatality or catastrophe.

  • Labor Dept. boosts safety violation penalties.  // Textile World;Aug94, Vol. 144 Issue 8, p20 

    Reports that Secretary of Labor Robert B. Reich announced a five-fold increase to the minimum proposed penalty for willful violations of federal job safety and health rules which could result in death or serious physical harm. Gravity-based factors for proposed penalties.

  • Workers stiffed. Freedman, Allan // Washington Monthly;Nov92, Vol. 24 Issue 11, p25 

    Reports that on-the-job injury rates--once on the decline--are now at their highest levels in a decade. Injury rates; Disabilities; Fatalities; How the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) fails to do its job; Dangers facing millions of American workers; The role of unions.

  • Willful citations to cost more.  // Occupational Hazards;Aug94, Vol. 56 Issue 8, p13 

    Reports on OSHA's announcement that willful violations of job safety standards, which could result in death or serious physical harm, are subject to a minimum fine of $25,000.

  • NACOSH is back.  // Occupational Hazards;Aug94, Vol. 56 Issue 8, p13 

    Reports that Bill Clinton's Administration has revived the National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health (NACOSH) which has not met since 1988. Establishment of NACOSH as a part of the Occupational and Safety Health Act of 1970.

  • One-year limit for construction rule.  // Occupational Hazards;Aug94, Vol. 56 Issue 8, p14 

    Reports that Assistant Secretary-OSHA Joseph A. Dear has given the newly appointed Steel Erection Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee until July 1995 to develop a consensus standard.

  • Carolinas' VPP approved.  // Occupational Hazards;Aug94, Vol. 56 Issue 8, p14 

    Reports that OSHA has approved the adoption of Voluntary Protection Programs in two state-plan states, North Carolina and South Carolina.

  • OSHA agrees to revise `MO 500' program. Figura, Susannah Zak // Occupational Hazards;Dec96, Vol. 58 Issue 12, p13 

    Reports on the revision of the `Missouri 500' (MO 500) cooperative compliance program due to industrial safety complaints. Participation of industry and other groups in the drafting of the subsequent program; Selection of criteria based on industry-specific and facility-specific information.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics