Unofficial strike action proves costly for union

Merrick, Neil
February 1995
People Management;2/23/1995, Vol. 1 Issue 4, p12
Illustrates a case of unofficial strike action involving the postal workers' union which proved cost the union a government fine. Details on the causes of the strike and the High Court's action against it; Analysis of other cases of strikes wherein courts intervened on the request of employers; Public attitude towards the use of legislation in the courts by employers.


Related Articles

  • Congress upholds Clinton's order on striker-replacements. Laabs, Jennifer J. // Personnel Journal;Apr95, Vol. 74 Issue 4, p11 

    Reports on the United States Congress' support for President Bill Clinton's executive order on striker replacements by federal contractors. Defeat of attempt of Republican legislators to overturn the mandate; Legal action by business organizations against the measure; Passage of a...

  • Permanent replacements return.  // Dollars & Sense;Nov/Dec96, Issue 208, p4 

    Relates the court decision legalizing the hiring of permanent replacements for striking employees by government contractors in the United States despite President Bill Clinton's executive order.

  • CLINTON'S CLOUT. Seligman, Daniel; de Llosa, Patty // Fortune;5/1/1995, Vol. 131 Issue 8, p141 

    Comments on Executive Order 12954, issued by President Bill Clinton in March 1995. How the order says that companies which hire permanent replacements for striking workers can no longer expect to win any federal contracts over $100,000; The authors' impressions of this order; Concern that...

  • Editor's NOTE. Mooney, Clyde // Australian Hotelier;Nov2012, Vol. 29 Issue 10, p6 

    The article offers the author's insights on the three-strikes penalty system imposed by the government of New South Wales.

  • Final rules on striker replacement order written.  // HRMagazine;Jul95, Vol. 40 Issue 7, p4 

    Reports that the Department of Labor has issued the final regulations for President Bill Clinton's executive order 12954, an attempt to penalize federal contractors for hiring permanent replacement workers during labor strikes. Effectivity of the rules in June 26, 1995.

  • LIBERALS TO INTRODUCE 'THREE STRIKES' POLICY.  // Australian Hotelier;Dec2010, Vol. 27 Issue 11, p8 

    The article reports on the plan of the New South Wales (NSW) Liberals and Nationals Government to launch a "three strikes and you're out" policy for licensed venues in measures to reduce antisocial behaviour associated to alcohol.

  • Striker order may affect papers.  // Editor & Publisher;4/29/95, Vol. 128 Issue 17, p36 

    Reports on the potential impact for newspapers of US President Bill Clinton's executive order requiring the federal government to cancel contracts with businesses that use permanent replacement workers to substitute for employees on strike. Concerns of the Newspaper Association of America.

  • IMRA backs appeal of striker rule.  // Discount Store News;6/19/95, Vol. 34 Issue 12, p19 

    Reports on the International Mass Retail Association's support for the appeal of Federal Judge Gladys Kessler's decision to postpone ruling on a lawsuit that would try to block a presidential executive order barring federal contracts over $100,000 to companies that hire permanent replacement...

  • Public sector strikes--legislation and court treatment. Barrett, Jerome T.; Lobel, Ira B. // Monthly Labor Review;Sep74, Vol. 97 Issue 9, p19 

    Reports that United States legislatures and courts have adjusted public policy regarding work stoppages. Unwillingness of public employees to continue the tradition of respecting the public policy prohibiting work stoppages; Overview on legislation which prohibits work stoppages in several...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics