TITLE

Part-time staff take action over unfair treatment

AUTHOR(S)
Merrick, Neil
PUB. DATE
April 1995
SOURCE
People Management;4/20/1995, Vol. 1 Issue 8, p13
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the legal action of part-time staff on unfair dismissal and discrimination in Great Britain. Reason in the increasing number of part-time and temporary workers; Profile of employees illegally dismissed.
ACCESSION #
9710210083

 

Related Articles

  • An Analysis of Employment Discrimination Claims Associated with Layoffs. Williams, Scott David; Slonaker, William M.; Wendt, Ann C. // SAM Advanced Management Journal (07497075);Winter2003, Vol. 68 Issue 1, p49 

    Analyzes the employment discrimination claims associated with layoffs in the U.S. Trends causing layoffs; Role of supervisors in preventing perceptions of discrimination.

  • Firing A 'Termination Proof' Worker. Maatman Jr., Gerald L.; Bee, Lisa // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;11/10/2003, Vol. 107 Issue 45, p30 

    Provides guidelines in dealing with a long-term employee exhibiting poor job performance. Articulation of legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for a proposed personnel decision; Assessment of the employee's job performance during the probationary period; Assessment of compliance with internal...

  • Unfair dismissal and alternative work.  // Accountancy;Aug1992, Vol. 110 Issue 1188, p88 

    Reports on the British court of appeals ruling which states that an employer's dismissal of an unsuitable employee could be treated as unfair in an event of failure by the employer to investigate possible alternative employment. Details of the case; Reasons for unsuitability of employment.

  • Legal Briefs.  // Manager's Legal Bulletin;11/1/2015, Vol. 29 Issue 21, p2 

    The article offers legal-related news briefs in the U.S. including the lawsuit filed by an employee against her employer for unlawful termination, the strength testing used by a trucking firm for screening employees, and the racial discrimination complaint filed by an employee against the company.

  • Make sure documentation backs up reason for firing.  // HR Specialist: Minnesota Employment Law;Feb2011, Vol. 4 Issue 2, p3 

    The article focuses on the importance of the documentation that would back up the reason for the termination of employees who later sue and complain that they are treated less favorably than other employees.

  • Make sure documentation tells complete story of terminated worker's conduct.  // HR Specialist: North Carolina Employment Law;Feb2011, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p3 

    The article focuses on the need for employers to ensure good documentation of an employee's termination story as a way to counteract the claims of employee for discrimination during a lawsuit.

  • Mandate: Old dogs, new tricks. Allerton, Haidee E. // Training & Development;Jun98, Vol. 52 Issue 6, p8 

    Cites a ruling by the Superior Court in Sacramento, California that firing an older worker does not prove discrimination. Basis for termination of the plaintiff.

  • You make the call: The Decision.  // Legal Alert for Supervisors;7/27/2012, Vol. 8 Issue 173, p4 

    The article discusses the court case wherein an African American employee claims racial profiling has caused his termination in a company.

  • Court carves out another age-bias class: Employees age 50 and older.  // HR Specialist: Pennsylvania Employment Law;Jun2012, Vol. 7 Issue 6, p3 

    The article offers the author's insight on the court case Karlo, et al., v. Pittsburgh Glass Works dealing with reduction in force (RIF) process that could result to age discrimination among employees.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics