TITLE

Ballot-box solutions win confidence vote

AUTHOR(S)
Overell, Stephen
PUB. DATE
April 1997
SOURCE
People Management;4/3/1997, Vol. 3 Issue 7, p11
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that major employers are becoming increasingly familiar with the requirements of corporate elections. Reason why the companies moves towards representative democracy; Problems in corporate election encountered by different organization; Reason for the rising demand for the assistance of Electoral Reform Ballot Services (ERBS) for corporate election.
ACCESSION #
9710181665

 

Related Articles

  • Politics and Senior-level Financial Executives. Heffes, Ellen M. // Financial Executive;Oct2010, Vol. 26 Issue 8, p8 

    The section introduces articles and topics within the issue of "Financial Executive," including an examination of issues and events in the U.S. that will influence governance, coverage of several aspects of the midterm elections, and an article on how small- and mid-sized entities are surviving...

  • Dissidents, and dissent, in the boardroom.  // Directors & Boards;2004 Fourth Quarter, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p23 

    Presents an interview on the possibility of greater shareholder say in director elections in the U.S. Culture of board process and interaction; Etiquette for handling dissent. INSET: Dissident Director Panel..

  • Fur flies over voting pool. Basson, Deon // Finance Week;12/2/2002, p34 

    Reports the correlation between absolute control and corporate failure in South Africa. Accounts on the use of voting pool for board elections; Emphasis on the victory for sound corporate governance; Impact of entrenchment control on takeover bid.

  • Electing directors: The votes do matter. WALKING, RALPH A. // Directors & Boards;2009 1st Quarter, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p16 

    The article focuses on the process of the election of corporate directors, and discusses the impact of the shareholder votes on the election of directors and changes in the corporate policy. It states that there is a significant relationship between the firm performance, director performance,...

  • Majority Board Election: Where Do We Stand? Vaaler, Bryn R. // Corporate Board;Jan2008, Vol. 29 Issue 168, p16 

    The past several years have seen accelerating change in the ways corporations nominate and elect board members. While the SEC battles over rules to allow shareholder access to the proxy nomination ballot, a majority of large U.S. companies have made it easier for shareholders to vote out...

  • New Policy on Election Objections.  // Labor Law Journal;Dec74, Vol. 25 Issue 12, p771 

    This article focuses on the refusal of an employer's attorney to sign or accept the tally of the ballots for a board election. A decision was then made to mail the tally to the employer's attorney. He was advised that objections to the elections had to be received by the close of business on...

  • Are Routine Director Elections A Thing Of The Past? Douglas, Kevin H. // Corporate Board;Jan/Feb2010, Vol. 31 Issue 180, p5 

    For decades, the re-election of management's slate of board members has been a routine certainty at most corporations. Now, the onset of proxy access and the loss of broker discretionary voting promise to permanently alter the landscape of public company board elections. How should your company...

  • Corporate governance under proportional electoral systems. Suh, Jaekwon // Public Choice;Mar2012, Vol. 150 Issue 3/4, p671 

    This paper provides a political explanation for the form of corporate governance captured by the degree of minority shareholder protection (MSP). Using a multi-stage game model of three-party competition under proportional electoral systems, I demonstrate that the electoral threshold-the minimum...

  • Safeway Changes Election Rule. Zwiebach, Elliot // SN: Supermarket News;11/28/2005, Vol. 53 Issue 48, p6 

    The article reports on the amendment of the corporate governance rule of Safeway in Pleasanton, California by its board of directors to enable directors to be elected by a majority vote. Change in a non-binding vote was favorably voted by a percentage of shareholders of the company during its...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics