TITLE

Courtroom round-up

AUTHOR(S)
Aikin, Olga
PUB. DATE
January 1996
SOURCE
People Management;1/11/1996, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p35
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents facts and Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions on two employment law cases. Colley versus Corkindale; Bass Taverns Limited versus Burgess.
ACCESSION #
9710180141

 

Related Articles

  • Christou and another v London Borough of Haringey.  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2012, p8 

    The article discusses the case Christou and another versus London Borough of Haringey in which the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that the implementation of a second disciplinary proceeding against a team manager and her subordinate social worker was fair.

  • Fahey v Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust.  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2012, p9 

    The article discusses the case Fahey versus Plymouth Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust in which the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that the trust had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages.

  • Pasab Ltd trading as Jhoots Pharmacy and another v Woods.  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2012, p9 

    The article discusses the case Pasab Ltd. trading as Jhoots Pharmacy and another versus Woods in which the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that victimisation only occurs when an employee's protected act is the reason for her dismissal.

  • Beaver Management Services v Acheson.  // Employers Law;Sep2012, p9 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the British Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the appeal by the respondent on the basis that the claimant did not have authority to act as its agent, in Beaver Management Services v. Acheson.

  • Some interesting legal cases.  // British Baker;6/17/2011, Special section p4 

    The article presents two cases such as Wang v University of Keele and the Spaceright Europe v Baillavoine on the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Great Britain.

  • Employer fined £10,000.  // Credit Management;Jun2010, p36 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) enforced a 10,000 pounds penalty to Bournemouth University for its failure to abide with the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004.

  • Harassment can be 'unwanted' even when employee does not complain. Hughes, Ceri; Parry, David; Mather, Carly // Employers Law;Aug2010, p7 

    The article discusses the court case, Munchkins Restaurant and H. Moss v J. Karmazyn and Others, wherein the Great Britain Employment Appeal Tribunal has ruled that the appellants were jointly and severally liable for sexual harassment claims of respondents, who were their former employees for...

  • IN BRIEF.  // Employers Law;Aug2010, p8 

    The article discusses the Employment Appeal Tribunal's rulings on crucial workplace cases in Great Britain, including one on effective date of employee termination, one on claims for stigma damages, and one on an employer's unambiguous termination of its employee.

  • Scotthorne v Four Seasons Conservations (UK).  // Employers Law;Aug2010, p8 

    The article discusses the court case, Scotthorne v. Four Seasons Conservatories, wherein the Great Britain Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed a decision by an employment tribunal not to order disclosure of documents said to be capable of supporting the appellant's claim for unfair termination...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics