TITLE

A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews

AUTHOR(S)
Jadad, Alejandro R.; Cook, Deborah J.
PUB. DATE
May 1997
SOURCE
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;05/15/97, Vol. 156 Issue 10, p1411
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents a guide on how to interpret discordant medical research. Ways in which reviews can disagree; Importance of the differences among the discordant reviews; Questions to be used in the evaluation of these reviews; Collaboration between researchers as an alternative approach to explore differences among reviews.
ACCESSION #
9706083968

 

Related Articles

  • THE TEMPTATIONS OF CHOCOLATE. Willcox, Merlin // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;10/29/2011, Vol. 343 Issue 7829, p864 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "The Temptations of Chocolate," by J. P. Mackenbach in the September 20, 2011 issue.

  • Double standards. Wilmshurst, Peter // BMJ: British Medical Journal;1/12/2013, Vol. 346 Issue 7890, p25 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Migraine Intervention with STARFlex Technology (MIST) trial: a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of patent foramen ovale closure with STARFlex septal repair implant to...

  • My experience in the drug industry.  // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;6/23/2012, Vol. 344 Issue 7862, p28 

    The author discusses how most post-marketing observational studies in drug companies are mainly designed to support and disseminate a marketing message. He indicates from his personal experience that these studies had more marketing than science behind them, which was done by "playing" with the...

  • Research of doubtful relevance. MacAuley, Domhnall // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;6/23/2012, Vol. 344 Issue 7862, p22 

    The author comments on how it is quite likely that medical researchers appear to have lost their way, as is evident from greater focus on the volume of publications rather than quality of research, thus highlighting the need to take a hard look at what is going on.

  • Ethics committees, principles and consequences. Hayry, Matti // Journal of Medical Ethics;Apr98, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p81 

    Opinion. Examines the role of philosophers in the evaluation process of research proposals submitted by biomedical scientists to ethics committees. How philosophers can assist ethics committees; Principlism involved in the evaluation process; Details on autonomy.

  • The Impact of Imputation on Meta-Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies. Jian Li; Yan-fang Guo; Yufang Pei1,3; Hong-Wen Deng // PLoS ONE;Apr2012, Vol. 7 Issue 4, p1 

    Genotype imputation is often used in the meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), for combining data from different studies and/or genotyping platforms, in order to improve the ability for detecting disease variants with small to moderate effects. However, how genotype imputation...

  • Research, statistics, and causality in dentistry. Mupparapu, Muralidhar // Quintessence International;2011, Vol. 42 Issue 8, p623 

    The author reflects on the role that dental research studies play in disease treatment in the field of dentistry. He suggests that most methods of research have drawbacks. He argues that that dentists should use the best available dental research evidence to formulate treatment guidelines for...

  • ENDGAMES. Birdi, K.; Weir-McCall, J.; Grace, R.; Howlett, D. C.; Sedgwick, Philip // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;9/17/2011, Vol. 343 Issue 7823, p593 

    A quiz concerning the increasing confusion due to head injury, the non-randomised studies, and the fever in a returning traveller is presented.

  • Articles disputing link between HRT and breast cancer spark criticism. Kmietowicz, Zosia // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;1/28/2012, Vol. 344 Issue 7841, p1 

    The article reports that professor and epidemiologist Kim McPherson has condemned the authors of a series of articles that challenged the well established association between breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics