TITLE

Special Courts

PUB. DATE
June 1996
SOURCE
United States Government Manual;1996/1997, p75
SOURCE TYPE
Book
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents information about the Special Courts of the United States. Provisions under Article III, section 2 of the Constitution regarding Special Courts; Establishments, responsibilities and authorities of Court of Federal Claims, Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, Court of Veterans Appeals and other United States Special Courts; Business of the Federal Courts.
ACCESSION #
9705306048

 

Related Articles

  • The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: Has the Scope of Military Appellate Courts' Jurisdiction Really Changed since Clinton v. Goldsmith? Lowery, Tyesha E. // Army Lawyer;Mar2009, Issue 430, p49 

    The article presents several cases which determines the jurisdiction of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) and the courts of criminal appeals in the U.S. It highlights the case of Maj Goldsmith which implied the intent of the U.S. Supreme Court to modify the range of appellate...

  • Special Courts.  // United States Government Manual;2007/2008, p75 

    The article offers information on the special courts in the U.S. It states that the U.S. Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction over claims seeking money judgments against the U.S. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces was established under Article I of the U.S. Constitution pursuant...

  • "I've Got to Admit It's Getting Better"*: New Developments in Post-Trial. Flor, Major Andrew D. // Army Lawyer;Feb2010, Issue 441, p10 

    The article focuses on the developments in the post-trial process in the U.S. It discusses three CAAF post trials decisions in 2008 such as the United States v. Bush, which clarified the requirement in setting prejudice in a .post-trial delay case to receive relief, while the other two cases...

  • THE SKY HAS NOT FALLEN: A BRIEF LOOK AT THE IMPACT OF UNITED STATES V. WALTERS TEN YEARS LATER. COHEN, W. SHANE; SUSSMAN, JONATHAN S. // Air Force Law Review;2013, Vol. 70, p31 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (UCAAF) on the case United States v. Walters, and its impact on the court-martial practice of military practitioners and appellate courts. It discusses the use of words "on divers occasions" in the Walters case...

  • The Next Judge. Fidell, Eugene R. // Journal of National Security Law & Policy;2011, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p303 

    The article presents the author's views on the qualification and election process of appointing a judge to fill in a judicial vacancy in the U.S. It mentions that the term for judge Andrew S. Effron as the chief judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces will expire on September...

  • Annual Review of Developments in Instructions--2001¹. Hargis, Michael J.; Sitler, Martin H. // Army Lawyer;Aug2002, Issue 355, p1 

    Discusses cases decided during the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces' 2001 term. Child pornography; Threat against the U.S. president; Parental discipline offense; Larceny and electronic fund transfer.

  • Practicing What the Court Preaches--2007 New Developments in Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure Law. Stewart, Stephen R. // Army Lawyer;Jun2008, Issue 421, p2 

    The article discusses various reports published within the issue, including the search and seizure cases handled by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2006 and how the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) make decision on cases by considering the Georgia versus Randolph case.

  • Marine Corps Base Quantico.  // Marines;Apr98, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p10 

    Reports on the admission of Marine judge advocates from Quantico, Virginia to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) in Washington on March 23, 1998. Composition of the CAAF; Requirements for lawyers seeking admission to the CAAF; Identification of the judges admitted to...

  • Annual Review of Developments in Instructions-2008. O'Brien, Edward J.; Grammel, Timothy // Army Lawyer;Mar2009, Issue 430, p1 

    The article presents several cases decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) during its 2008 term which are essential for criminal law practitioners. It covers crimes and defenses such as lesser included offenses, indecent and aggravated assaults, and gambler's and mistake...

  • There's More to the Game than Shooting: Appellate Court Coaching of Panel Selection. Voir Dire, and Challenges for Cause. Neill, S. Charles // Army Lawyer;Mar2009, Issue 430, p72 

    The article presents court cases decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) which highlights the fundamentals and defense which are essential to court-martial procedures. It highlights the case United States v. Nieto which discusses the fundamentals significant for jury...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics