Two public entities extend partner benefits

Lenckus, Dave
May 1997
Business Insurance;5/12/97, Vol. 31 Issue 19, p6
Reports that two public entities in the United States, are taking contrasting approaches to extending health benefits for domestic partners to their employees. Outline of the health benefit plan proposed by the City Council of Tucson, Arizona; Benefit plans that are being implemented in Arlington County, Virginia; Differences between both plans; Their advantages and disadvantages.


Related Articles

  • CALIFORNIA: Voters Face Pension Ballot. Ward, Andrew // Bond Buyer;8/1/2008, Vol. 365 Issue 32931, p9 

    The article reports on the approval of a ballot measure which requires voters in Orange County, California to approve future increases in public employee pensions. The measure requires the Orange County Employee Retirement System to devise a study of the cost of the proposed benefit increase. It...

  • Civil Service to launch pensions.  // Employee Benefits;Sep2002, p10 

    Reports on the Civil Service's launching of a new pensions.

  • Employers fearing fiduciary liability. Wojcik, Joanne // Business Insurance;3/18/2002, Vol. 36 Issue 11, p3 

    Focuses on the increase responsibility of employers on retirement plans for employees in the U.S. Problems associated with employee benefits budget; Responsibilities of employers on employees retirement investment decisions; Provision of retirement plan for employees.

  • Sears reneges on retiree health benefits.  // H&HN: Hospitals & Health Networks;10/20/97, Vol. 71 Issue 20, p84 

    Reports on Sears, Roebuck cancellation of payments for Medicare supplemental insurance for employees who retire after 1999. Impact of move on cost control; Percentage of firms offering retiree benefits.

  • Public-sector plans risk staff wrath. Hope, Katie // People Management;1/13/2005, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p7 

    Reports on the proposed changes to the pension packages of government employees in Great Britain. Reactions of government employees on the proposed changes; Arguments of labor unions on the proposed changes; Impact of the proposed changes on the moral contract between the government and the...

  • Pensioners' Christmas bonus. Greene, Chris // Accountancy;Oct87, Vol. 100 Issue 1130, p46 

    Announces that pensioners in Great Britain have been granted tax-free Christmas bonuses beginning December 1987.

  • Paying for a crisis we didn't create. Serwotka, Mark // New Statesman;12/5/2011, Vol. 140 Issue 5082, p11 

    The author criticizes a proposal from the government of Great Britain that would compel public-sector workers to pay higher pension contributions. He argues that the existing level of contributions is sustainable, and that the added payments will not be used to improve pensions. Comparisons are...

  • CALIFORNIA: CalPERS Takes 20% Hit. Saskal, Rich // Bond Buyer;10/24/2008, Vol. 366 Issue 32989, p9 

    The article reports that participating governments in the largest public employee pension system will possibly face a bill for increased pension contributions to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) in California. The released statement of CalPERS indicated that if a 20%...

  • Indian Civil Servants Pension Liability Projections: An Alternative Framework. Sanyal, Ayanendu; Gayithri, K.; Erappa, S. // IUP Journal of Public Finance;May2011, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p7 

    The central government pension scheme of India has experienced a major shift from January 1, 2004. These reforms have been undergone to contain the fiscal liability. This paper first critically examines the existing frameworks to project pension liability. An alternative framework is developed...


Read the Article

Courtesy of

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics