TITLE

Synopsys aims secrets charge at Ambit

AUTHOR(S)
Erkanat, Judy
PUB. DATE
March 1997
SOURCE
Electronic News;03/24/97, Vol. 43 Issue 2160, p8
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on Synopsys' lawsuit against Prakash Bhalerao and Ambit Design Systems due to allegations of misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, extortion/unfair competition and breach of fiduciary duty. Comments from Synopsys business development and legal senior vice president Paul Lippe; Synopsys' refusal to describe what it considers trade secrets.
ACCESSION #
9704082383

 

Related Articles

  • Synopsys drops Ambit CEO suit. Steffora, Ann // Electronic News;01/26/98, Vol. 44 Issue 2203, p56 

    Reports that the lawsuit against Ambit Design Systems chief, Prakesh Bhalerao was cancelled by Synopsys Inc. Accusations by Synopsys that Bhalerao misappropriated trade secrets when he left the company in 1997.

  • Synopsys: Round Two.  // Electronic News;9/6/2004, Vol. 50 Issue 36, pN.PAG 

    Reports on the filing of a second class-action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of all persons who purchased Synopsys Inc. securities between December 3, 2003 and August 18, 2004. Allegations of the lawsuit; Effect of the news on the company's...

  • Synopsys Asks to Subpoena Mentor in Magma Case. Mutschler, Ann Steffora // Electronic News;10/2/2006, Vol. 52 Issue 40, p37 

    The article reports on the action taken by Synopsis Inc. to re-open its case against rival company Magma Design Automation in relation to Mentor Graphics Corporation's request to reexamine two Synopsis patents. This case will be heard by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 20, 2006. An overview...

  • PTO Looks Again at Patent in Magma/Synopsys Feud. Taylor, Colleen // Electronic News;12/11/2006, Vol. 52 Issue 50, p10 

    The article reports that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office will reexamine Patent No. 6,725,438, one of three patents at issue in a patent case between Magma Design Automation Inc. and Synopsys Inc. The ownership of the patents was the subject of the U.S. District Court for the Northern...

  • Cases.  // Journal of Criminal Law;Jun2007, Vol. 71 Issue 3, pv 

    The article presents a list of court cases.

  • Untitled.  // New Yorker;11/11/1974, Vol. 50 Issue 38, p139 

    An excerpt from "Jacksonville Florida Times-Union," is presented concerning a litigation proceeding.

  • Prop 8 appeal to be heard Dec. 6.  // Windy City Times;10/27/2010, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p9 

    The article announces that oral arguments in the Proposition 8 case, Perry v. Schwarzenegger, will be heard by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on December 6, 2010 at 10 a.m. at the James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse in San Francisco, California.

  • Ambit CEO urges `silicon catalogs'. Detar, Jim // Electronic News;03/16/98, Vol. 44 Issue 2210, p1 

    Presents an interview with Prakesh Bhalerao, president and chief executive officer of Ambit Design Systems. Forecasts of a paradigm shift in the semiconductor industry in system-on-silicon designs; Growing importance of intellectual property issues in the industry; Insights on the factors...

  • Court Unreasonably Refuses to Suspend Trial for Litigant's Religious Observance. Zemil, Brian A. // Litigation News;Summer2011, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p7 

    The article discusses a court case, Neustadter v. Holy Cross Hospital of Silver spring Inc., wherein the highest court of Maryland released that the court can misuse its discretion by refusing to suspend case of a litigant because of his two days absence for religious reason. It further states...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics