TITLE

Order of Entry as a Moderator of the Effect of the Marketing Mix on Market Share

AUTHOR(S)
Bowman, Douglas; Gatignon, Hubert
PUB. DATE
June 1996
SOURCE
Marketing Science;Summer96, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p222
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Order of entry has been demonstrated to have a significant effect on market share. A number of explanations for this effect have been suggested in the marketing and strategy literatures. To date, the market share advantage gained by pioneers has typically been treated as a main effect--an automatic regularity. Treating order-of-entry as a main effect implies that there is no penalty on the effectiveness of a brand's marketing instruments for late entry and that a late entrant can compensate for being late by dedicating sufficient marketing resources to their product. In this study, we investigate the influence of order-of-entry into a market on the effectiveness of a firm's marketing mix decisions by asking the question, "Can followers compensate for not being first by their marketing mix decisions?" Also, even if they can compensate for being late, does this effort become increasingly more difficult with later entry? That is, are there asymmetries in the effectiveness of a brand's marketing mix variables that relate to its order of entry into the market, or as has been typically assumed to date, is order of entry strictly a main effect? An asymmetry exists, for example, if the market response to advertising is different for the first entrant versus the second or third entrant. An asymmetry also exists if the effects of, say, a price change by the first entrant on the second entrant are different than the effects on the third entrant. We develop a market share attraction model where the parameters vary as a function of order-of-entry. Our main contribution is in modeling the sources of order-of-entry advantage as asymmetries in the effectiveness of a brand's marketing instruments. Hence, distinct from previous research we explain why there are inherent order-of-entry effects. This paper is potentially of interest to researchers developing market share models and studying the effectiveness of marketing-mix variables. The substantive implication of our results concern directly academics interested in marketing strategy as well as the practicing marketing strategists. We model asymmetries in the market response of early entrants versus late entrants using data from two durables and three nondurables categories. With one exception, all data sets are established from the inception of the category and hence do not suffer from the possible bias of excluding pioneers who have failed. Results show that asymmetries in the effectiveness of a brand's marketing mix variables are an essential source of order-of-entry effects; we find that the main effects of order of entry are minimal. Order-of-entry effects do not necessarily lead to lower shares, but overcoming these effects is not without substantial cost to the late entrant. Our results support previous research that has demonstrated advantages to early entry. In addition, we provide guidelines for how late entrants should compete. Later entry tends to reduce a competitor's price sensitivity, suggesting that they not instigate in a price war with earlier entrants in order to gain share. Order-of-entry tends to decrease response to quality and to promotion. To achieve the same impact on market share, later entrants need a bigger change in quality and need to spend more on promotion. Our data did not support an asymmetric effect on advertising.
ACCESSION #
9703074764

 

Related Articles

  • Consider terms and conditions. to determine pricing policy. Kirschbaum, Les // Marketing News;3/19/1990, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p12 

    The article discusses the need for marketers to consider terms and conditions to determine pricing policy. In selling merchandise and services in a volatile market, strategic and competitive pricing contribute to increase market share. Among the questions that must be asked when price change is...

  • Generic and Brand Advertising Strategies in a Dynamic Duopoly. Bass, Frank M.; Krishnamoorthy, Anand; Prasad, Ashutosh; Sethi, Suresh P. // Marketing Science;Fall2005, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p556 

    To increase the sales of their products through advertising, firms must integrate their brand-advertising strategy for capturing market share from competitors and their generic-advertising strategy for increasing primary demand for the category. This paper examines whether, when, and how much...

  • For Useful Ads, Must Define Market, Strategy.  // Marketing News;12/1/72, Vol. 6 Issue 11, p8 

    The article focuses on the importance of effective ad planning in advertising. As informed by Ken Mehrhof, regional vice president, Fuller & Smith & Ross, much advertising money is wasted by companies that don't take the time to define their markets and marketing strategies. Market share,...

  • Determinants of Competitor Response Time to a New Product Introduction. Bowman, Douglas; Gatignon, Hubert // Journal of Marketing Research (JMR);Feb1995, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p42 

    This research studies a neglected dimension of competitive defensive strategy--the speed of a competitor's reaction to the introduction of a new product. Building on the literature in organizational and strategic management, the authors investigate how the strategic pressures facing a firm and...

  • Getting to Know Millennium Mom. Barson, Donna // Global Cosmetic Industry;Sep2008, Vol. 176 Issue 9, p32 

    The article offers information on the marketing-related issue in the U.S. It states that 80% of the development in the amount of households in 2012 will be among directed by people 55 years old and older. Accordingly, in marketing share and present economic condition, marketers should have a...

  • Market Entry Prediction Competition 2010. Hariskos, Wasilios; Leder, Johannes; Teodorescu, Kinneret // Games (20734336);Jun2011, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p200 

    We submitted three models to the competition which were based on the I-SAW model. The models introduced four new assumptions. In the first model an adjustment process was introduced through which the tendency for exploration was higher at the beginning and decreased over time in the exploration...

  • How Does Rivals' Presence Affect Firms' Decision to Enter New Markets? Economic and Sociological Explanations. Koçak, Özgecan; Özcan, Serden // Management Science;Nov2013, Vol. 59 Issue 11, p2586 

    Four distinct theoretical programs have examined market entry decisions of multiunit firms, advancing different explanations for the relationship between a firm's likelihood of entry into a geographical market and the number of rivals that are already present in the target market. Within the...

  • The Marlboro jolt.  // Advertising Age;4/12/1993, Vol. 64 Issue 15, p16 

    Comments on the decision of Philip Morris Cos. to cut the price of its Marlboro brand to maintain market share. Decline of the power of brand names; Significance of the Marlboro price cut; Other companies forced to sacrifice price for market survival.

  • Exploring Territorial Differences in the Relationship Between Marketing Variables. Wittink, Dick R. // Journal of Marketing Research (JMR);May77, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p145 

    The parameters of a market share response function are estimated by using time series data separately for several sales territories. In a second stage an attempt is made to explain territorial differences in parameter estimates. It appears that for the brand studied advertising may serve to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics