GE: Promises, But No Delivery

Hahn, Avital Louria
April 2003
Investment Dealers' Digest;4/21/2003, Vol. 69 Issue 16, p8
Trade Publication
Reports on the U.S. lawsuit involving power testing equipment maker Panametrics Inc. and General Electric Co. General Electric's payment of less than the agreed upon amount for Panametrics; General Electric's alleged violation of the antifraud provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; History of the acquisition deal.


Related Articles

  • Fraud by GE alleged in lawsuit.  // Occupational Hazards;Jan97, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p24 

    Reports on the fraud by General Electric Co. of the tort suit filed by former employees of Lockheed Corp. concerning effects of chemical exposure from GE product in Los Angeles, California. Provision of false testimony in a 1995 trial by an expert GE witness; Explanation of the lawsuit claims...

  • GE, states settle debt collection probe. Reed, Vita // Las Vegas Business Press;08/17/98, Vol. 15 Issue 33, p18 

    Reports that Nevada will receive part of the settlement between multiple state attorneys general and General Electric Corp.'s (GE) credit card unit. Unlawful debt collection practices of GE; Estimate on state residents affected by the situation; Reaffirmation agreements between GE and its...

  • GE Challenges Superfund Law. Brostoff, Steven // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;12/04/2000, Vol. 104 Issue 49, p1 

    Reports the lawsuit filed by General Electric (GE) company against the Superfund law in the United States. Arguments of GE on the statute; Reaction to the lawsuit.

  • legal news for supervisors.  // Legal Alert for Supervisors;6/21/2013, Vol. 9 Issue 195, p3 

    The article offers news briefs for the U.S. as of June 21, 2013 on topics including the court case EEOC v. Fabricut, Majors v. General Electric Co. and the release of a new tracking application from the law firm Fisher & Phillips LLP.

  • Surplus asset repeal rejected. Limbacher, Patricia B. // Pensions & Investments;5/30/1994, Vol. 22 Issue 11, p8 

    Reports on the Third US Circuit Court of Appeals' affirmation of a 1992 decision that said General Electric (GE) did not have to pay former RCA Corp. plan members more than their promised benefit at the merger of the two companies' plans. Case specifications; Excess assets as not benefits under...

  • GE sues Daimler-Benz, MTU over United Technologies pact. Kandebo, S.W. // Aviation Week & Space Technology;4/16/1990, Vol. 132 Issue 16, p19 

    Covers the $1.15-billion suit General Electric Corp. has filed against West Germany's Daimler-Benz and its MTU subsidiary over Daimler's decision to withdraw from the GE90 aircraft engine program and work instead with GE's primary rival, Pratt & Whitney. Injunctions sought; MTU engine program...

  • News breaks.  // Aviation Week & Space Technology;8/14/1995, Vol. 143 Issue 7, p17 

    Reports that the lawsuit alleging safety problems in General Electric engines resulting from electrical bonding deficiencies has been settled for $7.1 million in US District Court, Cincinnati.

  • News in brief.  // New Hampshire Business Review;09/24/99, Vol. 21 Issue 21, p22 

    Reports on business-related developments in New Hampshire as of September 24, 1999. Settlement by General Electric of the defamation lawsuit filed by a former employee; Call by environmental groups for the protection of remote, roadless areas of the White Mountain National Forest from...

  • South Africa.  // Africa Report;Mar/Apr94, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p12 

    Reports on the indictment of South Africa's De Beers Centenary A.G. and the General Electric Company. Charges of conspiration to raise and fix world prices of diamonds; Accusations that De Beers Consolidated Mines fixed the world price of diamonds for decades; Anti-trust investigation by the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics