Lehman: Plans Cannot Bypass the Code (Even with Consent)

July 2014
ABI Journal;Jul2014, Vol. 33 Issue 7, p16
The article discusses the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the bankruptcy case of financial services firm Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. The reimbursement of attorneys' fees at the case of Adelphia Communications Corp. is tackled. Also explored is the legislation under the Bankruptcy Code of the country.


Related Articles

  • District Court: No Reimbursement Without Substantial Contribution. WORKMAN, DONALD A.; KESSLER, DENA S.; KLIDONAS, GEORGE // ABI Journal;Jul2014, Vol. 33 Issue 7, p14 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for financial services firm Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.'s bankruptcy case. Discussed is the issue on the reimbursement of attorneys' fees, noting the review of the fee-reimbursement provision...

  • Court establishes claims bar dates in Lehman Brothers bankruptcy.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2009 Q3, Special section p1 

    The article reports on the Bar Date Order entered on July 2, 2009 by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. et al. chapter 11 cases. The order sets separate deadlines for filing proofs of claim against Lehman including rejection damage claims, Derivative claims and...

  • Silly Lawyer Tricks. Donlon, Tom // Appellate Practice Journal;Summer2015, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p4 

    The article discusses the mistakes of appellate lawyers at several court cases. Topics include a lawyer's failure to state the error of the district court's decision in Nixon v. City & County of Denver, a lawyer's violation of the court's word limit in Pi-Net International v. JP Morgan Chase,...

  • B of A Relents on Some Claims vs. Lehman.  // American Banker;9/30/2011, Vol. 176 Issue F338, p6 

    Brief information is given about investment bank Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.'s settlement with Bank of America (B of A) Corp. and B of A's Merrill Lynch unit concerning derivative claims against the bankrupt Lehman Brothers and the investment bank's liquidation and creditor-payback plan.

  • $40M Lehman Settlement Approved.  // American Banker;6/25/2012, Vol. 177 Issue 97, p6 

    The article presents information about a class action lawsuit against Lehman Brothers Holdings' former employees and the $40 million mortgage-backed securities settlement that was approved in New York City by U.S. District Court in Manhattan's Judge Lewis A. Kaplan.

  • Suit Says Banks Owe Lehman $3 Billion.  // American Banker;9/16/2010, Vol. 175 Issue 143, p2 

    The article discusses a court case wherein U.S. financial services company Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. is suing several banks and investment firms to recover funds that were wrongly transferred to credit-default-swap counterparties following bankruptcy fillings.

  • Barclays Says Lehman Owes it $3B.  // American Banker;2/1/2010, Vol. 175 Issue 16, p12 

    The author reports that Barclays PLC has said that it owes nothing on the purchase of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., which sued Barclays for return of secret profits.

  • Bank wins $500,000 over false reference. Bronstien, Barbara F. // American Banker;1/11/1995, Vol. 160 Issue 7, p6 

    Reports that a U.S. District Judge awarded $500,000 in punitive damages to Citizens State Bank that successfully sued Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc. over a false credit reference. Background on the case; Court ruling of U.S. District Judge John W. Lungstrum.

  • N.Y. Fed and Barclays Lacked 'Plan B'  // American Banker;9/9/2010, Vol. 175 Issue 139, p2 

    Brief information is given about a deal between Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Barclays PLC and Lehman Brothers' lawsuit against Barclays concerning the sale of assets.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics