TITLE

Class Action's Last Hope: The Argument for Federal Statutory Rights Preemption of the Federal Arbitration Act

AUTHOR(S)
REDDISH, MATTHEW
PUB. DATE
December 2013
SOURCE
Journal of Dispute Resolution;2013, Vol. 2013 Issue 2, p429
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article examines the history behind several recent federal decisions on class arbitration as well as federal antitrust laws in the U.S. and discusses how antitrust laws should be enforced in the relation to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). Topics discussed include waiver of class arbitration and state public policy, the Sherman Act, which is the first U.S. federal legislation to regulate antitrust actions, and correction of the FAA for consumer and employee protection.
ACCESSION #
96883601

 

Related Articles

  • Use Caution When Asking Employees to Waive Rights. SEBOK, Albert // State Journal (WV);10/4/2013, Vol. 29 Issue 39, p29 

    The author discusses the need to use caution in waiving the statutory rights of employees. He states that employees' rights remain difficult to waive and courts are concerned that employers are gaining unfair competitive advantages in coercing the rights of employees to overtime protections and...

  • BORK'S "LEGISLATIVE INTENT" AND THE COURTS. GINSBURG, DOUGLAS H. // Antitrust Law Journal;2014, Vol. 79 Issue 3, p941 

    The article focuses on former U.S. Solicitor General Robert Bork and his interpretation of the U.S. Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. Topics include U.S. antitrust law, the restraint of trade, and competition in U.S. markets. Information is provided on economic efficiency, consumer welfare, and...

  • High court limits right to class-action suits. HOLLAND, JESSE // Buffalo Law Journal;5/2/2011, Vol. 83 Issue 35, p1 

    The article reports that consumer advocacy groups are criticizing a new ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in a dispute between AT&T Mobility and a California couple which allowed businesses to block their customers from using class-action arbitration.

  • The Death of Class Arbitration After Concepcion? Weston, Maureen A. // Kansas Law Review;2011, p767 

    The article focuses on the future of class arbitration act and implications of Concepcion by analyzing the federalism issues. It proposes a regulatory framework that controls class arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and discusses some important decisions of Supreme Court...

  • EDITOR'S NOTE: ROBERT BORK, ORIGINALISM,AND BOUNDED ANTITRUST. DI VINCENZO, ADAM J. // Antitrust Law Journal;2014, Vol. 79 Issue 3, p821 

    The article focuses on Robert Bork, former U.S. Solicitor General, and his impacted on the development of U.S. antitrust law. Topics include his paper on the U.S. Sherman Act, his work on consumer welfare laws in the U.S., and his thoughts on the legality of capital punishment. Information is...

  • The Treatment of Non-Team Sports under Section One of the Sherman Act. Thomas, Cyntrice; Baker III, Thomas A.; Byon, Kevin // Virginia Sports & Entertainment Law Journal;Spring2013, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p296 

    The article offers information on the treatment of non-team sports under the U.S. Sherman Act including overview of Sherman Act under antitrust law, intra-enterprise conspiracy doctrine, and use of single-entity defense in professional sports league.

  • Empirical Evidence and Class Certification in Labor Market Antitrust Cases. JOHNSON, JOHN H.; DAVID, JESSE; TORELLI, PAUL A. // Antitrust Magazine;Fall2010, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p60 

    The article presents the authors' comments on class actions which highlight three kinds of antitrust allegations, in the U.S. These allegations are--agreements not to compete, information exchanges, and "naked" wage-setting agreements. Some of the cases discussed are Weisfeld v. Sun Chemical...

  • OVERCHARGE BUT DON'T OVERESTIMATE: CALCULATING DAMAGES FOR ANTITRUST INJURIES IN TWO-SIDED MARKETS. Tracer, Daniel M. // Cardozo Law Review;Dec2011, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p807 

    No abstract available.

  • D.C. District Court Denies Railroads' Motion to Dismiss in Antitrust Fuel Surcharge Litigation.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q4, Special section p1 

    The article discusses the decision of the Federal District Court for Washington, D.C. to deny a motion to dismiss a class-action lawsuit filed against the four major U.S. railroads. According to the lawsuit, the railroads fuel surcharges violated federal antitrust laws, and that the complaint...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics