Cutting Special Vacation Deals Can Backfire on Employers
- Legal Briefs. // HR Specialist: Minnesota Employment Law;Jun2011, Vol. 4 Issue 6, p3
The article offers legal news briefs as of June 2011 on topics such as employee and employer's dispute over Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and a vague employee complaint that is not protected by law.
- Compromise on Family Leave Bill. McMillon, Rhonda // ABA Journal;Dec91, Vol. 77 Issue 12, p106
Discusses the modifications to the family and medical leave legislation in the U.S. Accountability requirements for employees taking leave; Requirements for foreseeable leaves for childbirth, adoption of planned medical treatments; Enforcement procedures paralleling long-standing Fair Labor...
- The FMLA: When does 50 not equal 50? // HR Specialist: Employment Law;Jun2011, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p1
The article discusses the difference between Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) coverage from FLMA eligibility. It mentions that coverage applies to the employer while eligibility to the employee. It states that private employers having 50 or more employees need to with FMLA and asserts that...
- Ten Myths About the Family and Medical Leave Act. Volin, Andrew W. // Labor & Employment Law;Spring2008, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p13
The article discusses 10 myths related to the U.S. Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Some of them are: A private employer subject to other federal employment laws is also subject to the FMLA; Every employee of an employer subject to the FMLA is eligible for FMLA leave; An employee can take 12...
- When salesperson travels, where's FMLA base? // HR Specialist: Illinois Employment Law;Sep2009, Vol. 3 Issue 9, p1
The article offers information on the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) in the U.S. It states the application of FMLA to employees who worked more than 1,250 hours wihin one year, and a staff of 50 or more provided by employer within 75 miles of employee' base. It highlights a court case...
- miscellany. // Labor Law Journal;Aug90, Vol. 41 Issue 8, p609
The article reports that the U.S. president vetoed the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1990, which would have mandated that employers of 50 or more workers provide their employees with leave under specified circumstances. An attempt to override the veto in the House fell short on a vote of 232...
- Hours an Employee "Would Have" Worked May Count Toward 1250 Hour Requirement. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2005 Q2, p1
The article discusses whether hours an employee would have worked but for an unlawful termination should be counted toward the 1,250 hour requirement of the Family and Medical Leave Act. The Plumely court held that such hours should not be included in counting the 1,250 hour requirement, whereas...
- Online Poll. // Business Insurance;6/16/2003, Vol. 37 Issue 24, p23
The article presents results of an online poll on the most common reason an organization's employees take leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act.
- Your Message To Employers: Manage FMLA With Other Benefit Programs. Auerbach, Rebecca // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;4/22/2002, Vol. 106 Issue 16, p14
Discusses the implications of the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act in the U.S. on employee benefits. Background on the law; Discussion on the risks of non-compliance; Cost of poor tracking and compliance procedures; Impact on employers.