TITLE

COOK COUNTY CRIMINAL LAW PRACTICE IN 1929: A COMMUNITY'S RESPONSE TO CRIME AND A NOTORIOUS TRIAL

AUTHOR(S)
Geraghty, Thomas F.
PUB. DATE
March 2002
SOURCE
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Spring/Summer2002, Vol. 92 Issue 3/4, p555
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article describes the practice law in the courts of Cook County, Illinois in 1929, using a study of Cook County's criminal justice system and one high-profile case as the basis for that description. The trial of the People v. Fisher case was conducted within the system described by a survey. The lawyers involved in the case, both prosecution and defense, displayed skill and dedication. The defense lawyers, in particular fought with remarkable zeal to save their clients' lives in the face of overwhelming odds. The defense team consisted of John Fogle on behalf of Leonard Shadlow, Richard E. Westbrooks on behalf of Leon Brown and Joseph Lofton on behalf of Lafon Fisher. A review of the trial record and other documents in the case reveals considerable confusion over one key fact. The State's theory at the trial of Fisher, Shadlow, Brown and Jenkins was that Shadlow was in possession of the sawed off shotgun and that Shadlow and Brown noted that John E. Geraghty, a patron of the bank who witnessed the robbery, identified Shadlow as the robber who had the shotgun. Leo Pocquette, an employee of the bank who exchanged gunshots with the robbers and who was shot in the foot during the holdup, testified that Shadlow and the shotgun. So did an employee of the bank, Alexander McKay.
ACCESSION #
9665535

 

Related Articles

  • Apprehended Breach of the Peace: Lawfulness and Proportionality of Preventive Action. Davenport, Alan // Journal of Criminal Law;Apr2005, Vol. 69 Issue 2, p109 

    The article focuses on a case based on criminal damage in demonstrations against the Iraqi War. Between December 2002 and March 2003, a number of demonstrations against the hostilities in Iraq were held at Fairford, an air base in Gloucestershire which the U.S. Air Force had used during the...

  • SHAFER v. SOUTH CAROLINA: ANOTHER MISSED OPPORTUNITY TO REMOVE JUROR IGNORANCE AS A FACTOR IN CAPITAL SENTENCING. Baarsma, William // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Fall2002, Vol. 93 Issue 1, p23 

    This article describes the practice of criminal law in the courts of Cook County in 1929, using a 1929 study of Cook County's criminal justice system and one high-profile case as the basis for that description. The trial of the Fisher case was conducted within the system described by the survey....

  • The ordinary means of appeal in criminal law, from the perspective of the provisions of Law no. 202/2010 ("the small reform") and of the new Code of Criminal Procedure. LORINCZ, Anca-Lelia // Juridical Tribune / Tribuna Juridica;Jun2012, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p40 

    Aiming to ensure the celerity of the Romanian criminal trial, the legislative changes of the present Code of Criminal Procedure through Law no. 202/2010 have impacted also the matter of appeals, leading to fewer degrees of jurisdiction in most criminal cases. The actual Romanian Code of Criminal...

  • Departing U.S. Attorney to Build White-Collar Niche for Snell. Lee, Jessica C. // Orange County Business Journal;11/19/2007, Vol. 30 Issue 47, p4 

    The article focuses on Wayne Gross, who will head the new white-collar criminal defense practice at Snell & Wilmer LLP in Costa Mesa, California. Gross, is the former chief of the Santa Ana branch of U.S. Attorney's Office. Furthermore, at Snell & Wilmer, he will be assigned on executive...

  • NOT SO NUTTY. Caplan, Lincoln // New Republic;3/30/92, Vol. 206 Issue 13, p18 

    Examines key policies surrounding the use of insanity defense in the U.S. Aspects and considerations in criminal law; Attention towards basic questions about the bounds of responsibility that cannot be scientifically established; Need of standards and reform of insanity laws; Protection of...

  • Cases Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.  // Journal of Criminal Law;Oct2011, Vol. 75 Issue 5, pvii 

    A list of court cases discussed in volume 75 of the "Journal of Criminal Law" is presented.

  • Tony Oakoak (Appellant) and Her Majesty The Queen (Respondent). Oakoak, R. V. // Canadian Native Law Reporter;2012, Vol. 1, p409 

    The article discusses the 2011 Nunavut Court of Appeal case Oakoak v. Her Majesty the Queen (R. v. Oakoak) which deals with a prison sentence for two charges of breaches of probation in relation to incidents involving spousal assaults. The probation orders stated that the appellant was not...

  • CHAPTER 20. PROCEDURE FOR INITIATING A CRIMINAL CASE.  // Statutes & Decisions: The Laws of the USSR & Its Successor State;Mar/Apr2004, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p27 

    Focuses on the procedure for initiating a criminal case. Initiation of a public-prosecution criminal case; Determination of the investigative jurisdiction; Verification of a report of a crime.

  • CHAPTER 29. TERMINATION OF CRIMINAL CASES.  // Statutes & Decisions: The Laws of the USSR & Its Successor State;Mar/Apr2004, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p82 

    Discusses concepts related to termination of criminal cases. Grounds for termination of a criminal case or criminal prosecution; Decree for terminating a criminal case or criminal prosecution; Revocation of a decree terminating a criminal case or criminal prosecution.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics