TITLE

Improved incident reporting following the implementation of a standardized emergency department peer review process

AUTHOR(S)
Reznek, Martin A.; Barton, Bruce A.
PUB. DATE
June 2014
SOURCE
International Journal for Quality in Health Care;Jun2014, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p278
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Objective Incident reporting is an important component of health care quality improvement. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the effectiveness of an emergency department (ED) peer review process in promoting incident reporting. Design An observational, interrupted time-series analysis of health care provider (HCP) incident reporting to the ED during a 30-month study period prior to and following the peer review process implementation and a survey-based assessment of physician perceptions of the peer review process' educational value and its effectiveness in identifying errors. Setting Large, urban, academic ED. Participants and Interventions HCPs were invited to participate in a standardized, non-punitive, non-anonymous peer review process that involved analysis and structured discussion of incident reports submitted to ED physician leadership. Main Outcome Measures Monthly frequency of incident reporting by HCPs and physician perceptions of the peer review process. Results HCPs submitted 314 incident reports to the ED over the study period. Following the intervention, frequency of reporting by HCPs within the hospital increased over time. The frequencies of self-reporting, reporting by other ED practitioners and reporting by non-ED practitioners within the hospital increased compared with a control group of outside HCPs (P = 0.0019, P = 0.0025 and P < 0.0001). Physicians perceived the peer review process to be educational and highly effective in identifying errors. Conclusions The implementation of a non-punitive peer review process that provides timely feedback and is perceived as being valuable for error identification and education can lead to increased incident reporting by HCPs.
ACCESSION #
96390796

 

Related Articles

  • Follow-up Assessment of a Faculty Peer Observation and Evaluation Program. DiVall, Margarita; Barr, Judith; Gonyeau, Michael; Matthews, S. James; Amburgh, Jenny Van; Qualters, Donna; Trujillo, Jennifer // American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education;2012, Vol. 76 Issue 4, p1 

    Objective. To assess a previously described peer observation and evaluation program 2 years after implementation. Methods. An pre-implementation survey assessed faculty needs and attitudes related to peer evaluation. Two years after implementation, the survey was repeated and additional...

  • Fortifying individual case review activities. Spath, Patrice // Hospital Peer Review;Sep2007, Vol. 32 Issue 9, p129 

    The article focuses on the peer review requirement issued by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations for physicians and licensed independent practitioners (LIPs) in the U.S.

  • Interpreting the evidence. Spence, Des // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);9/14/2002, Vol. 325 Issue 7364, p587 

    Discusses the reliability of evidence based medicine. Dangers of meta-analysis; Publication bias; Pharmaceutical vested interests; Publication fraud; Importance of peer review; Suggestion that the evidence should be questioned.

  • A private matter. Tschida, Molly // Modern Physician;Apr2000, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p25 

    Reports on the ruling of the California Supreme Court on a medical malpractice suit, stating that peer review records are not allowed to be used in malpractice cases. Background information on the case; Basis of the decision.

  • Protecting non-physician peer review.  // Hospital Peer Review;Oct2011, Vol. 36 Issue 10, p109 

    The article discusses aspects of Florida's decision to join a group of states that provide no protection for any documents produced as part of peer review for non-physician provider.

  • Implementation of the Peer Review Council. Pedersen, Anne; Crabtree, Tricia; Ortiz-Tomei, Tammy // MEDSURG Nursing;Jun2004, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p172 

    Peer review is an integral part of professional nursing practice that traditionally involves licensed personnel evaluating one another. Peer review councils can structure the environment further, enhancing the consistency and meaningfulness of the evaluation process. A highly structured,...

  • Lessons Learned From 17 Years of HIV-Prevention Research.  // Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality;2005, Vol. 14 Issue 3/4, p123 

    The article discusses a review and meta-analysis of the peer reviewed HIV prevention intervention from 1985 to 2003 conducted in order to examine the extent to which different theoretical models can effectively inform effective risk reduction interventions. The review included data from...

  • PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS MAKING RETENTION DECISIONS.  // Education;Spring89, Vol. 109 Issue 3, p268 

    Previous research has shown that lowered academic achievement, increased behavior problems, discrimination against minorities and economic waste are the likely outcomes of the current common sense approach to making grade retention decisions. Professional procedures which are derived from the...

  • Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph - Meta-Analysis of Assessment Center Validity. Gaugler, Barbara B.; Rosenthal, Douglas B.; Thornton III, George C.; Bentson, Cynthia // Journal of Applied Psychology;Aug87, Vol. 72 Issue 3, p493 

    Meta-analysis (Hunter, Schmidt, & Jackson, 1982) of 50 assessment center studies containing 107 validity coefficients revealed a corrected mean and variance of .37 and .017. respectively. Validities were sorted into five categories of criteria and four categories of assessment purpose. Higher...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics