TITLE

End of an ERA?

AUTHOR(S)
Kondracke, Morton
PUB. DATE
April 1977
SOURCE
New Republic;4/30/77, Vol. 176 Issue 18, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Comments on the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) in the U.S. Citation of simple and complex explanations amidst speculations on the danger associated on its existence; Provisions under the ERA towards legalization of homosexual marriages, permission of gays to adopt children and establishment of unisex toilets in public buildings; Discussion on the arguments given by one of the most gifted practitioners of political diatribe in the country Phyllis Schlafly against the ERA.
ACCESSION #
9617281

 

Related Articles

  • MASSACHUSETTS.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;3/18/2004, Issue 847, p33 

    Reports that the Massachusetts legislators had given a preliminary approval to a constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriage. Rights of same-sex couple to wed; Approval of civil unions; Stand of politicians on the issue.

  • CA becomes first state to oppose FMA. Davis, Kevin // Bay Area Reporter;8/26/2004, Vol. 34 Issue 35, p2 

    Reports that the California Legislature has approved the resolution that opposes any federal constitutional amendment restricting the rights of same-sex couples. Support of the legislature to the measure; Details of the Assembly Joint Resolution 85; Amendment of federal marriage law.

  • An Amendment to Protect Marriage: Bad in Theory, Likely Worse in Practice. Strasser, Mark // BYU Journal of Public Law;2006, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p387 

    The article focuses on the controversy on passing a federal constitutional amendment to protect marriage in the U.S. It examines some of the difficulties posed by the current amendment and suggests that the reach of the amendment is far from clear, protestations to the contrary withstanding. It...

  • WASHINGTON, DC.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;3/18/2004, Issue 847, p37 

    Reports that Log Cabin Republicans, a group of gay and lesbian Republicans will air a television advertisement opposing a Bush-backed constitutional amendment that would prohibit gays and lesbians from marrying in Washington D.C. Importance of federal policy to the issue; Decision of the...

  • Counting heads. Jacobs, Ethan; Kiritsy, Laura; Ryan-Vollmar, Susan // Bay Windows;1/26/2006, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p1 

    The article considers the lobbying strategy of MassEquality to defeat an anti-gay marriage amendment that will be considered by the constitutional convention in Massachusetts on May 10, 2006. The problem is, MassEquality does not spend its fund on lobbying. Instead the organization outsources...

  • Constitutional amendments fall in state Legislature. Baldman, Anthony // Gay & Lesbian Times;5/12/2005, Issue 907, p14 

    Reports on Constitutional amendments aimed to ban same-sex marriage in California. Propositions sponsored by the Orange County-based Traditional Values Coalition to eliminate domestic partnerships and ban same-sex marriage and civil unions; Failure of the State Senate Constitutional Amendment 1...

  • TENNESSEE: Marriage Amendments Arise in the South.  // Just Out;11/3/2006, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p19 

    The article reports development on the proposed constitutional marriage equality amendments in the southern states of the U.S. Conservatives in Tennessee are concern that changes would be pushed through when it will get majority of votes from the citizens. Meanwhile, South Carolina and Virginia...

  • Equal Rights Postponement. Kaminer, Wendy // American Prospect;9/10/2001, Vol. 12 Issue 16, p34 

    Comments on the adoption of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the U.S. Constitution. Sponsors of ERA in 2001; Relation between acceptance of sexual equality and support for the ERA; Implication of the case Nguyen v. Immigration and Naturalization Service for the need for ERA.

  • symposium. Wilkins, Richard G.; Stewart, Monte; Stachelberg, Winnie // Insight on the News;8/5/2003, Vol. 19 Issue 17, p46 

    Presents opposing views on the issue of the need for a constitutional amendment to protect the institution of marriage in the U.S. Need to preserve the sanctity of marriage as the union between a woman and a man; Implication of a constitutional amendment for the equal protection of individuals.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics