TITLE

Ex-exec sues Dayton Hudson on charges of discrimination

AUTHOR(S)
Young, Vicki M.
PUB. DATE
September 1996
SOURCE
WWD: Women's Wear Daily;9/16/1996, Vol. 172 Issue 53, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on former Dayton Hudson Corp. senior vice president Mary Andert's lawsuit against DHC on charges of sex, age and pregnancy discrimination. Effects of the complain charges on women; DHC's real reason for Andert's termination.
ACCESSION #
9611030249

 

Related Articles

  • Focus Media sues Dayton for fraud. McCarthy, Michael; Martin, Ellen Rooney // Adweek Eastern Edition;9/9/1996, Vol. 37 Issue 37, p2 

    Reports on Focus Media's lawsuit against Dayton Hudson Corp. alleging fraud and breach of contract. Focus Media's claim that Dayton Hudson rigged the review for its media buying assignment in 1996; Other defendants named in the suit; Description of the review process.

  • An anticipated landmark decision involving issues related to psychological assessment of... Merenda, Peter F. // Psychological Reports;Feb93, Vol. 72 Issue 1, p102 

    Reports on an anticipated ruling by the California Supreme Court in 1993 that is likely to produce a serious impact on the use of psychological assessment procedures. Case of Sibi Soroka, et al v. Dayton Hudson Corporation; Use of the Rodgers Condensed CPI-MMPI (RCCM); More.

  • Focus Media sues Dayton for fraud. McCarthy, Michael; Martin, Ellen Rooney // Adweek Western Edition;9/9/96, Vol. 46 Issue 37, p62 

    Reports on the lawsuit filed by Focus Media against Dayton Hudson Corp. in Minneapolis alleging fraud and breach of contract. Terms of the suit; Other allegations made in the suit; Background on the case.

  • Cases.  // Journal of Criminal Law;Jun2007, Vol. 71 Issue 3, pv 

    The article presents a list of court cases.

  • Untitled.  // New Yorker;11/11/1974, Vol. 50 Issue 38, p139 

    An excerpt from "Jacksonville Florida Times-Union," is presented concerning a litigation proceeding.

  • Prop 8 appeal to be heard Dec. 6.  // Windy City Times;10/27/2010, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p9 

    The article announces that oral arguments in the Proposition 8 case, Perry v. Schwarzenegger, will be heard by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on December 6, 2010 at 10 a.m. at the James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse in San Francisco, California.

  • Court Unreasonably Refuses to Suspend Trial for Litigant's Religious Observance. Zemil, Brian A. // Litigation News;Summer2011, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p7 

    The article discusses a court case, Neustadter v. Holy Cross Hospital of Silver spring Inc., wherein the highest court of Maryland released that the court can misuse its discretion by refusing to suspend case of a litigant because of his two days absence for religious reason. It further states...

  • Plaintiff's Own Testimony Dooms Case. Rogak, Lawrence N. // Insurance Advocate;1/2/2006, Vol. 117 Issue 1, p12 

    The article presents the court case of Torain versus Labiner filed at the Civil Court in Bronx County, New York. The reason of the complaint was the plaintiff's fall from a flight of stairs at the defendant dentist's office. The testimony of the plaintiff and the defendant, and the grounds...

  • ROUNDUP. Mack, Debbi // Corporate Legal Times;Feb2001, Vol. 11 Issue 111, p74 

    Presents a circuit by circuit update on corporate cases in the United States as of February 2001. Inclusion of the New York City Transit Authority's dispute of a fraudulently procured settlement and judgment in personal injury actions; Petition by Shell Oil Co. and OXY USA Inc. for a rehearing...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics