TITLE

Lotus v. Borland: Menu command hierarchy of computer

AUTHOR(S)
Mota, Sue Ann
PUB. DATE
June 1996
SOURCE
Communications & the Law;Jun96, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p59
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Deals with copyrighting and US Congress' ability to enact copyright and patent laws. Reference to the Copyright Act of 1976; Purpose of the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU); Information on Lotus Development Corporation's action against Borland International Incorporated for infringement of Lotus' computer software menus.
ACCESSION #
9610290206

 

Related Articles

  • Appellate win for Borland may limit `look and feel' cases. Barney, Doug // InfoWorld;3/20/95, Vol. 17 Issue 12, p28 

    Reports on the implications of a ruling by the US Court of Appeals that cleared Borland International Inc. in a copyright infringement suit brought by Lotus Development Corp. Potential legal precedent that will limit the scope of future intellectual property disputes; Lotus' claims that Borland...

  • Supreme Court agrees to hear case on copyright of software.  // Hudson Valley Business Journal;10/16/95, Vol. 6 Issue 38, p19 

    Reports on a decision by the US Supreme Court to review a computer program copyright suit filed by Lotus Development Corp. against Borland International Inc. Infringement investigation for Lotus 1-2-3 software commands; Potential of the project for changing copyright interpretations.

  • Good news in threes for Borland. Dancer, Helen // Australian Personal Computer;Apr95, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p26 

    Reports that Borland won its appeal against the copyright infringement lawsuit filed by Lotus Development. History of the case; Judges' findings that Lotus' Quattro Pro spreadsheet is not a copyritable material; Significance of the court's decision on the future of intellectual property and...

  • Key Reader verdict shows need for open standards. Coffee, Peter // PC Week;8/30/93, Vol. 10 Issue 34, p32 

    Opinion. Argues that the decision of Judge Robert Keeton in the patent infringement case of Lotus Development Corp. versus Borland International Inc. is unsound. Software copyright case; Issue of menu structure and content; Implications to macro-users and developers; Macros as protection of a...

  • In software's Wild West, most copyrighters only hurt themselves. Foster, Ed // InfoWorld;4/24/95, Vol. 17 Issue 17, p62 

    Focuses on the court decision regarding Lotus Development Corp.'s copyright infringement suit against Borland International Inc. Issue of copyright in the computer industry; Disadvantages of using the courts rather than the marketplace to gain a strategic advantage; Lotus' experiences in...

  • Ghosts in the machinery. Frew, Andreas // New Scientist;2/24/96, Vol. 149 Issue 2018, p48 

    Presents updates on regulations affecting science and technology in the United States, as of February 1996. Case filed by Lotus Development against Borland International; Key issues being discussed by Republican presidential candidates.

  • Lotus wins latest skirmish against Borland. Freedman, Beth // PC Week;8/16/93, Vol. 10 Issue 32, p3 

    Reports on the development of Borland International Inc.'s lawsuit with Lotus Development Corp. Borland's Quattro Pro for DOS and Windows spreadsheets' macro key reader's infringement on Lotus copyrights for 1-2-3; Ability of macro key reader to allow Quattro Pro users to run macros created...

  • Final appeal. Freedman, Beth // PC Week;4/11/94, Vol. 11 Issue 14, p159 

    Reports on Borland International Inc.'s appeal on a patent-infringement suit. Presentation of final arguments by Borland and Lotus Development Corp.; Expectation of decision.

  • COMPUTER PROGRAMS, USER INTERFACES, AND SECTION 102(b) OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976: A CRITIQUE OF LOTUS V. PAPERBACK. Samuelson, Pamela // Law & Contemporary Problems;Spring1992, Vol. 55 Issue 2, p311 

    The article discusses the ruling issued by the U.S. court on the Lotus Development Corp. vs. Paperback Software International case, decided in June 1990. The ruling issued by Judge Keeton states that the copyright of Lotus for its popular 1-2-3 spreadsheet program protected the user interface of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics