TITLE

Weighty snack food

PUB. DATE
October 1996
SOURCE
Chain Store Age;Oct96, Vol. 72 Issue 10, p63
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on a lawsuit filed against Kmart by former employee Patricia Rue after she was fired for allegedly eating a pilfered bag of potato chips. Charges of defamation of character against Kmart for telling Rue's co-workers that she had stolen the snack food.
ACCESSION #
9610241715

 

Related Articles

  • A superior ruling. Urban, Jim // Executive Report;Sep97, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p47 

    Reports on Patricia Rue's filing of a defamation of character lawsuit against K-Mart. Information on collateral estoppel, a legal doctrine which the civil case turned on; Meaning of collateral estoppel for Rue; Why employment law attorneys cried foul regarding the decision of unemployment...

  • Two black women get $4 million verdict in suit against Kmart.  // Jet;10/16/95, Vol. 88 Issue 23, p25 

    Reports on the decision of a Birmingham, Alabama court jury granting the claim for damages of black women Deborah Cameron and Sonya Purdue against Kmart Corp. for false arrest and malicious prosecution. Kmart district manager Doug Sharp's order of arrest for the women for alleged shoplifting;...

  • Kmart to pay Calif. nearly $1m over Scanners.  // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;5/20/1994, Vol. 167 Issue 98, p2 

    Reports on the agreement of Kmart Corp. to pay $985,000 to the State of California to settle a complaint regarding the accuracy of its price scanners. Settlement procedure; Deduction of $3 off from any item that is scanned at a higher-than-listed price.

  • Workers lose bid for contempt ruling vs. Kmart. Fearnley-Whittingstall, Sophy // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;7/6/1994, Vol. 168 Issue 3, p15 

    Reports on a county court judge's denial of a request by Kmart workers to issue a contempt ruling against Kmart Corp. in an invasion-of-privacy case filed by the workers. Kmart's hiring of Confidential Investigative Consultants Inc. for an employee spying campaign; Alteration of documents...

  • 20/20 casts eye on Kmart repair suit. Halverson, Richard // Discount Store News;11/7/94, Vol. 33 Issue 21, p1 

    Reports on the national class action suit filed against Kmart by customers who were allegedly defrauded on auto repairs. Case background; Plaintiffs' allegations; Kmart's arguments.

  • Kmart settles scanning dispute.  // Discount Store News;11/7/94, Vol. 33 Issue 21, p3 

    Reports on Kmart's settlement of the Michigan attorney general's complaint in connection with the company's scanners' overcharging of customers. Terms of the settlement; Complaint's allegations; Kmart's settlement of previous cases.

  • Labor dispute settled. Malcolm, Teresa // National Catholic Reporter;09/06/96, Vol. 32 Issue 38, p6 

    Reports on Kmart Corp.'s settlement of a labor struggle in Greensboro, North Carolina last July 1996. Agreement to sign a new labor contract; Campaign made by the Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Workers since November 1993; Support of civic and business leaders in resolving the issue.

  • Salvation May Come Down to a Matter of Reliance. Feldman, Robert A. // Corporate Legal Times;Aug2001, Vol. 11 Issue 117, p9 

    Discusses the case 'Rudder v. Kmart Corp. in the District Court of the Southern District of Alabama. Court's holding regarding the buyer's warranty claim; Negation of reliance.

  • Teamsters: Kmart violated privacy.  // Discount Store News;10/4/93, Vol. 32 Issue 19, p2 

    Reports on the lawsuit filed by Teamsters Union against Kmart for alleged violation of its members' privacy. Employment of undercover detectives; Formation of personal relationships with employees; Denial of charge by Kmart.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics