TITLE

New approaches to compensation

AUTHOR(S)
Zinkewicz, Phil
PUB. DATE
September 1996
SOURCE
Insurance Advocate;09/07/96, Vol. 107 Issue 35, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on new approaches to compensation management in the United States, according to a study by the firm Buck Consultants. Popularity of alternative reward strategies; Merit pay increases; Factors in considering extra payments; Bonus payouts to sales and nonsales executives.
ACCESSION #
9610221141

Tags: COMPENSATION management;  PAY for performance

 

Related Articles

  • Study: Most Merit Plans Have No Merit. Ortiz, Lauralee // Credit Union Journal;05/07/2001, Vol. 5 Issue 19 

    Focuses on the impact of the merit pay system on the employees and businesses in Berkeley, California. Pros and cons of imposing merit pay system within the company; Elements of a successful merit plans; Opinion of a merit pay expert on pay-for-performance systems.

  • Honest questions needing honest answers. Ferracone, Robin; Turner, Matt // Directors & Boards;Summer2002, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p11 

    Presents five questions that corporate compensation committees should be asking and answering in the U.S. Lip service to pay-for-performance in executive compensation; Reason for targeting executive compensation above the market median; What kind of performance the company is buying with its...

  • In The News.  // HR Specialist: Compensation & Benefits;Nov2011, Vol. 6 Issue 11, p1 

    The article offers news briefs related to the compensation and benefits sector in the U.S., which include the introduction of Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) Voluntary Classification Settlement Program, an Aon Survey which states that workers can get bigger money through variable pay and one...

  • Executive Benefits in a Pay-for-Performance Environment. Uyl, Janet Den; Kopacz, Patricia // Employee Benefits Journal;Sep2002, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p14 

    Presents an excerpt from the book 'Paying for Performance: A Guide to Compensation Management,' 2nd edition.

  • Study Suggests Most Comp Plans Aren't Effective.  // Credit Union Journal;10/15/2001, Vol. 5 Issue 41, pN.PAG 

    Reports on the need for credit unions to align their compensation plans with their business plan according to a report from the Filene Research Institute. Information on the negative result produced by the merit pay systems; Suggestion of Edward Deci, professor of psychology and director of the...

  • Goldilocks in the Corner Office. Wirtz, Ronald A. // Region (10453369);Dec2006, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p22 

    The article discusses the compensation mechanism for chief executives officers from economic perspective. Though some economists claim that huge compensation package received by CEOs is inefficient, the lucrative compensations system aligns the interest of CEO with those of the shareholders....

  • Bookshelf. Brotherton, Phaedra // HRMagazine;Jan98, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p122 

    Reviews the book `Paying for Performance: A Guide to Compensation Management,' by Peter T. Chingos and KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.

  • Effective Delegation: Good Profits and Interesting Work. Foster, Thea // Chartered Accountants Journal;Oct2001, Vol. 80 Issue 9, p27 

    Reveals obstacles to accounting partners and senior staff's effective delegation of authority. Need for training to implement good delegation process; Costs of poor delegation; Steps in effectiveness delegation; Remuneration system that rewards successful delegation.

  • The Annual Merit Increase: Who Gets What?  // Benefits Quarterly;2004 Fourth Quarter, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p75 

    This section presents the summary of the article The Annual Merit Increase: Who Gets What?, by Terry Satterfield, published in the July-August 2004 issue of Benefits & Compensation Solutions.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics