TITLE

HCFA cancels survey of doc expenses

AUTHOR(S)
Gardner, Jonathan
PUB. DATE
September 1996
SOURCE
Modern Healthcare;9/23/96, Vol. 26 Issue 39, p35
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that a mail survey of 5,000 physician practices that was to the used to develop a Medicare compensation schedule for practice expenses, was canceled by HCFA due to low response rates. Percentage of physician Medicare revenues is represented by practice-expense compensation; Beliefs of physicians; Information on the mail survey; Comments from Marie Michnich, senior associate executive vice president at the American College of Cardiology.
ACCESSION #
9610120405

 

Related Articles

  • Residents in a high radon potential geographic area: Their... Ferng, Shiaw-Fen; Lawson, Jay K. // Journal of Environmental Health;Jan/Feb1996, Vol. 58 Issue 6, p13 

    Reports on a questionnaire mail survey conducted to measure the social characteristics of Boone County, Indiana's residents. Key objectives of the survey; Who the data was analysed by; Findings of study.

  • On federal regulation.  // Nation's Business;Mar95, Vol. 83 Issue 3, p68 

    Presents a survey questionnaire about the effectiveness and efficiency of American federal agencies' regulations.

  • Using incentives in mail surveys.  // Agri Marketing;Sep95, Vol. 33 Issue 8, p35 

    Discusses the reasons for using incentives in a mail survey. Factors that need to be considered before selecting an incentive; Money as the most effective and least biasing incentive.

  • Amount, Timing, and Value of Financial Incentives in Mail Surveys: Does It Make a Difference? Bergmann, Thomas J.; Hannaford, William J. // Marketing Research;Sep90, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p30 

    Documents the effectiveness of monetary incentives in generating improved response rates for mail surveys. Influence of timing on effectiveness of incentives; Consideration for the nature of questions being asked and types of respondents; Recommendation for making two mailings to validate results.

  • IMPACT OF 'BLOCKING' WITHIN PRENOTIFICATION APPEAL ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES. Nataraajan, Rajan; Angur, Madhukar G. // Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice;Fall96, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p106 

    This paper deals with a new aspect of mail survey prenotification that the authors call "blocking," which refers to the opportunity given in a prenotifying letter to a potential mail survey respondent to choose not to participate in the survey by indicating non-interest through the return of a...

  • Letter to the Editor. Reed, Terry; Page, William F. // Behavior Genetics;Jul1997, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p271 

    Reports on the general mail survey of members of the 1998 National Academy of Sciences (NAS)-National Research Council (NRC) Twin Registry. Total number of twins born between 1917 and 1927; Construction and zygosity classification methods of the registry; Overview on previous mail surveys of...

  • EFFECTS OF SPONSOR AND PREPAYMENT ON COMPLIANCE WITH A MAILED REQUEST. Doob, Anthony N.; Freedman, Jonathan L.; Carlsmith, J. Merrill // Journal of Applied Psychology;Jun73, Vol. 57 Issue 3, p346 

    Examines the effects of prepayment on compliance of applied work through a mail surveys in California. Transformation of occasional letters being returned; Compliance of people on research conducted by university sponsors than commercial study; Avoidance of guilt.

  • THE EFFECTS OF MAILED REMINDERS AND TAILORED MESSAGES ON MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING. McCaul, Kevin D.; Wold, Kimberly S. // Journal of Community Health;Jun2002, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p181 

    Examines the mailed reminders and tailored messages on mammography screening in North Dakota. Comparison among the types of mailings with Medicare recipients; Rates of mammography for women in conditions; Potentials of tailoring messages for effective intervention.

  • Physician Response Rates to Mail and Personal Interview Surveys. Shosteck, Herschel; Fairweather, William R. // Public Opinion Quarterly;Summer79, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p206 

    Presents an experiment conducted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration which compares the mail and personal administration survey on physician antibiotic prescription practices. Advantages of mail surveys; Design of the experiment; Focus of the study towards the office based physicians.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics