TITLE

Tobacco verdict may cost insurers

AUTHOR(S)
Lonkevich, Dan
PUB. DATE
August 1996
SOURCE
National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;8/19/96, Vol. 100 Issue 34, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the implications of a court decision against Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. Landmark verdict handed down by Florida state court in case called Grady Carter v. American Tobacco; Documents indicating that tobacco industry knew nicotine was addictive and hid information from smokers; Lawsuit against the tobacco industry to recover Medicaid costs related to tobacco products.
ACCESSION #
9609040488

 

Related Articles

  • Documents key in tobacco case. Bradford, Michael // Business Insurance;8/19/96, Vol. 30 Issue 34, p1 

    Discusses the precedent set by the case Carter versus Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. Facts of the case; Implications to future lawsuits against tobacco companies; Damages awarded to Grady Carter and wife.

  • One man's crusade against tobacco firms. Scherer, Ron // Christian Science Monitor;11/30/95, Vol. 88 Issue 4, p3 

    Talks about the possible threats to US tobacco industry following former Brown & Williamson (B&W) Tobacco Co. senior executive Jeffrey Wigand's impending testimony of his former employer's knowledge about effects of smoking. Restraining order obtained by B&W to prevent Wigand from violating...

  • Before the Court.  // Supreme Court Debates;Feb2000, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p62 

    Presents excerpts from the arguments for the U.S. Supreme Court case 'Food and Drug Administration (FDA) etal. v. Brown & Williamson et al.' Influence of the U.S. Surgeon General's issuance of report on the addictiveness of nicotine on the implementation of the regulation by the U.S. Food and...

  • Phyllis Small v. Lorillard v. The American Tobacco Co. v. Brown & Williamson v. Philip Morris v. R.J. Reynolds.  // Current Legal Documents;1950-, p0 

    Presents legal documents in the case of Phyllis Small vs. Lorillard vs. The American Tobacco Co. vs. Brown & Williamson vs. Philip Morris vs. R.J. Reynolds which was argued on July 16, 1998. List of plaintiffs in the case; Details of consolidated appeals; How the plaintiffs are seeking justice...

  • FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.  // Current Legal Documents;1950-, p0 

    Presents the United States Supreme Court case of the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) vs. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp which was decided on March 21, 2000. History of the case; Rules passed by the FDA regarding the sale of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco to teenagers; Tobacco-specific...

  • U.S. Wins Case But No Fines for Big Tobacco. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;8/21/2006, Vol. 357 Issue 32449, p1 

    The article reports that the U.S. Department of Justice has ruled that the tobacco industry is guilty of civil fraud and racketeering. An overview of the case is presented. Gladys Kessler, the U.S. District Judge, has found that the defendants including Philip Morris USA Inc., R.J. Reynolds...

  • Tobacco firm blows off claim.  // American Libraries;Jun95, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p504 

    Reports on the Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co.'s withdrawal of its confidentiality claim to more than a third of its photocopied company documents donated to the University of California/San Francisco library archive. Moving of documents into police-evidence vault; Availability of papers to...

  • `Stolen' tobacco papers open.  // Quill;Sep95, Vol. 83 Issue 7, p19 

    Reports that a Florida Judicial Circuit Court judge has denied the Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.'s request to seal stolen documents filed with the court. Account of a lawsuit filed by the state against cigarette manufacturers.

  • Nationwide sales force may trigger WARN liability. Kuenstler, John F. // Corporate Legal Times;Jan97, Vol. 7 Issue 62, p48 

    States that an employer who terminates sales representatives stationed throughout the United States without giving 60 days notice violated the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN). Case of Carliante v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics