TITLE

Brooklyn girl awarded $35.6 million in hospital lawsuit

PUB. DATE
August 1996
SOURCE
Jet;08/12/96, Vol. 90 Issue 13, p9
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that Shivonne McDonald, an 8-year-old girl in Brooklyn, New York city, was awarded $35.6 million by the Brookdale Hospital. Malpractice suit; Brain and neurological injuries sustained at birth due to negligence.
ACCESSION #
9608270889

 

Related Articles

  • A Hmong family in court.  // Christian Century;3/14/90, Vol. 107 Issue 9, p272 

    Reports on a California ruling that a Hmong family must have their son's dislocated hip and club feet surgically corrected despite their religious objections. Teachings of the shamans; Family's previous experience with illness; Plans to sacrifice a chicken.

  • Medical malpractice lawsuits are increasing.  // Consumers' Research Magazine;Jan1986, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p16 

    Deciding who is to blame--doctors, lawyers, insurers, or patients--may depend on whose statistics one chooses to believe. The surge in litigation is adding billions to health care costs, insurance and taxes.

  • How do expert witnesses get away with lying? Crane, Mark // Medical Economics;01/11/99, Vol. 76 Issue 1, p152 

    Focuses on the means by which expert witnesses in a medical malpractice trial get away with lying in court. Overview on the strategies utilized by expert witnesses in order for them to get away with lying in a malpractice trial; Medical licensing boards' focus on stopping incompetent doctors...

  • Malpractice CONSULT. Johnson, Lee J. // Medical Economics;09/04/2000, Vol. 77 Issue 17, p157 

    Presents a question and answer advisory on physician malpractice in the United States. Relevance of a physician's legal history in a trial; Use of prior conduct to attack a witness's credibility; Sample cases; Importance of admission of prior claims when preparing for a court hearing.

  • Should plaintiffs' experts get cotingency fees? Crane, Mark // Medical Economics;10/13/97, Vol. 74 Issue 20, p58 

    Focuses on the contingency fees received by plaintiffs' expert in a malpractice trial, questioning if it is ethical or legal for them to receive some of the money. Effects of both the plaintiff's attorney and expert witness receiving contingency fees on the amount that is left for the injured...

  • Attorney Malpractice... inadequate research. Ashman, Allan // American Bar Association Journal;Jul75, Vol. 61 Issue 7, p872 

    Reports on the California Supreme Court ruling which upheld a lower court decision in a malpractice lawsuit filed against a lawyer who rendered service in a divorce action. Overview of the case; Causes of the alleged malpractice; Justification of the court's decision.

  • Friedman v. Dozorc.  // American Journal of Law & Medicine;Winter79, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p428 

    Focuses on the Michigan court case 'Friedman v. Dozorc,' where the court ruled that a physician who was granted a directed verdict in a medical malpractice suit did not have a cause of action against the attorneys who he claimed had negligently filed and pursued the suit against him. Question...

  • Martin v. Trevino.  // American Journal of Law & Medicine;Winter79, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p429 

    Discusses the Texas court case 'Martin v. Trevino,' where a physician alleged that his patient and her attorneys had negligently filed a medical malpractice suit against him without just cause. Claim of separate causes of action in the suit; Texas Court of Civil Approach's rejection of each of...

  • Malpractice Consult. Johnson, Lee J. // Medical Economics;10/05/98, Vol. 75 Issue 19, p113 

    Presents a question and answer segment pertaining to malpractice lawsuits. Why discussing your malpractice suit is seen as dangerous; Information on sexual discrimination lawsuits; Reason a gender-bias complaint is likely to be dismissed.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics