Congress agrees: Luxury tax is out

Frame, Phil
August 1996
Automotive News;8/5/1996, Vol. 70 Issue 5672, p4
Trade Publication
Reports on the US Congress' decision to phase out the luxury automobile tax. Amount generated by the tax each year; Opposition from the American International Automobile Dealers Association and the National Automobile Dealers Association to the tax since its proposal in 1990.


Related Articles

  • Auto luxury tax may be doomed; it's about time.  // Automotive News;11/27/1995, Vol. 70 Issue 5634, p12 

    Opinion. Comments on the implications of US Congress' plan to eliminate the luxury tax on automobiles. Inefficiency of the luxury tax.

  • Federal tax on luxury vehicles dies quietly. Stoffer, Harry // Automotive News;12/23/2002, Vol. 77 Issue 6017, p6 

    Reports that the federal tax on luxury vehicles in the U.S. will be abolished on December 31, 2002. Decline in revenue generated through federal tax on luxury cars from 1993-2001; Percentage tax levied on luxury cars; Possible effect of the decision on automobile sales in December 2002.

  • TAX FILE: More lenient depreciation caps. Simonson, Ken // Fleet Owner;Aug2003, Vol. 98 Issue 8, p14 

    Reports on the decision of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service on the taxation of moving vans and some delivery trucks. Consequences of the ruling for depreciation deductions; Details of the rule on luxury automobiles; Application of the rules to vans and light trucks.

  • Mercedes moving headquarters to the Southeast. Mulvihill, Geoff; Foody, Kathy Leen // South Texas Automotive Report;Feb2015, Vol. 17 Issue 6, p19 

    The article reports on the decision of German luxury automobile maker Mercedes-Benz AG to move its U.S. headquarters from New Jersey to Atlanta to become closer to its manufacturing facility in Alabama.

  • Automakers unite for assault on luxury tax. Frame, Phil // Automotive News;9/18/1995, Vol. 70 Issue 5623, p6 

    Reports on the lobbying efforts of automobile makers to have the luxury tax on automobiles phased out. Completion of the 1996 budget reconciliation act; Amount of luxury taxes in 1994; Concerns about the extension of the tax.

  • LUXURY STEALS BACK. Echikson, William // Fortune;1/16/1995, Vol. 131 Issue 1, p112 

    Reports on the growth of the luxury good market across the globe. Popularity of designer clothes in the U.S.; Increase in the worldwide sales of luxury goods in 1994; Decision of U.S. President Bill Clinton to rescind the controversial surcharge on all pricey products except automobiles;...

  • Should the Present Tax on Automobiles Be Retained? Pro. Mellon, Andrew W. // Congressional Digest;Jan1928, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p20 

    Argues for the retention of taxes levied on automobiles in the U.S. in 1927. Pressure on the Congress to repeal the excise tax on the sale of automobiles; Need for automobile owners to contribute to government spending on major road constructions which are for the benefit of automobile drivers;...

  • GATT goofed.  // Automotive News;10/17/1994, Vol. 69 Issue 5574, p12 

    Opinion. Reports on the conclusion of a panel of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade that the luxury tax on cars do not protect American automobile makers. Congress' indexing of tax at a price level excluding the major automobile makers.

  • Hyundai plans to make a luxury car for the US. Treece, James B. // Automotive News Europe;5/16/2005, Vol. 10 Issue 10, p22 

    Reports on the plan of Hyundai to introduce a luxury automobile in the U.S. in 2007 to test the potential for launching a luxury brand. Reason for choosing the country to launch a luxury brand; Issues that need to be settled by the company before introducing a luxury brand in the country;...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics