In an ideal world

Wilson, James Q.
August 1996
New Republic;8/12/96, Vol. 215 Issue 7, p21
Claims that as long as the U.S. government responds to all unmarried women and fatherless children with the aid to families with dependent children program, welfare cannot be fundamentally reformed. Core to the underclass problem; Significance of substantial federal assistance amid the crisis faced by the underclass.


Related Articles

  • Family Care after Welfare Ends. Oliker, Stacey // National Forum;Summer2000, Vol. 80 Issue 3, p29 

    Deals with the changes in caregiving after the repeal of the Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) in 1996 in the United States. Discussion of the welfare reform in the country; Care strategies in the final years of AFDC; Effects of mandatory work on mothers' networks of support.

  • Public Reactions to Poor Families: Characteristics That Influence Attitudes toward Assistance. Groskind, Fred // Social Work;Sep91, Vol. 36 Issue 5, p446 

    This article discusses characteristics of low-income families that influence attitude of American public in judging deserved amounts of public assistance. The article is based on a vignette study describing poor single- and two-parent families with varying levels of income, numbers of children,...

  • Manpower report finds welfare reform working in Oregon.  // State Legislatures;Sep98, Vol. 24 Issue 8, p8 

    Reports the success of the welfare reform program of the United States federal government in Oregon. Details on the study commissioned by the United States Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Education; How the state of Oregon implemented the program.

  • Recasting welfare. Worsham, James // Nation's Business;Nov95, Vol. 83 Issue 11, p30 

    Reports on the possible phaseout of federal entitled program, Aid to Families With Dependent Children, the cash payments to low-income mothers and children. Provisions under welfare-reform measures; Impact of the welfare-reform on small businesses; Changes in the welfare system.

  • Childfare: A New Direction for Welfare Reform. Baratz, Morton S.; White, Sammis B. // Urban Studies (Routledge);Dec96, Vol. 33 Issue 10, p1935 

    In August 1996, President Clinton signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act, fulfilling his campaign promise to ''end welfare as we know it''. The legislation replaces the six-decade-old Aid To Families With Dependent Children programme (AFDC) with so-called workfare under...

  • This safety net supports work. Keane, Michael // Christian Science Monitor;5/1/95, Vol. 87 Issue 108, p19 

    Analyses the drawbacks of the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and points out some suitable measures to be taken for the welfare of single mothers and their children. Work subsidy to single mothers and it's advantages; Disadvantages of the welfare-reform proposals by the Clinton...

  • Why the new workfare won't work. Gilbert, Neil // Commentary;May94, Vol. 97 Issue 5, p47 

    Focuses on the workfare experiment of the American government limiting welfare to two years. Proposed system; Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program recipients; Participation in public-works programs for unemployed; Projected costs; Demotivation of people with lower-paying...

  • Historical growth in participation in Aid to Families with Dependent Children: Was there a structural shift? Moffitt, Robert // Journal of Post Keynesian Economics;Spring87, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p347 

    Analyzes the growth in participation in aid to families with dependent children (AFDC) in the U.S. Trends in AFDC participation rates; Responsiveness of the AFDC participation rate to the state of the national economy; Trends in the monthly income received by female heads of families; Estimates...

  • The fifth estate: How and why the poverty industry distorts welfare issues and displaces the... Funiciello, Theresa // Social Justice;1994, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p94 

    Criticizes the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program. Comparison with the welfare benefits given to a widow; Argument that the human service sector is living off poor people; Growth of the social service sector of the welfare state while AFDC benefits have dropped.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics