TITLE

Court rejects Colorado's antigay amendment

AUTHOR(S)
R.N.S.
PUB. DATE
June 1996
SOURCE
Christian Century;6/05/96, Vol. 113 Issue 19, p609
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the United States Supreme Court's rejection of a voter-approved Colorado constitutional amendment prohibiting laws designed to protect gay and lesbian rights. Proposed legislation allowing states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages; Reactions of political and religious organizations.
ACCESSION #
9606156417

 

Related Articles

  • TWINS OR TRIPLETS?: PROTECTING THE ELEVENTH AMENDMENT THROUGH A THREE-PRONG ARM-OF-THE-STATE TEST. Bladuell, H�ctor G. // Michigan Law Review;Feb2007, Vol. 105 Issue 4, p837 

    The article deals with the impact of Prong Arm-of-the-State test on the Eleventh Amendment in the U.S. constitution. Even if the Supreme Court expanded the immunity of the Amendment to a wide variety of institutions that states have established to administer their affairs, no practical and...

  • FEDERAL YOUTH CONTROL. P. L. B. // America;3/12/1938, Vol. 58 Issue 23, p533 

    The article discusses the issue of the continuous rejection on amending Federal youth-control in the U.S. According to the article, it has been fourteen years since extensive advertising failed to win the amendment among various states, and now an attempt to bring the case to the U.S. Supreme...

  • Exclusionary Club. Savage, David G. // ABA Journal;Aug2000, Vol. 86 Issue 8, p40 

    Focuses on the ruling issued by the United States Supreme Court on July 28, 2000 which upheld the right of the Boy Scouts of America to exclude gay men from their ranks. Reaction of conservative groups to the ruling; Private groups which failed to preserve their men-only policies.

  • Testing the ban.  // Advocate;12/05/2000, Issue 826, p14 

    Focuses on the United States Supreme Court's upholding of the Boy Scouts of America's gay ban. Firing of a high ranking Boy Scouts official.

  • What Is "Cruel and Unusual"? Wittes, Benjamin // Policy Review;Dec2005/Jan2006, Issue 134, p15 

    The article reflects on the jurisprudential problem associated with the Eight Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It discusses the complexity of the meaning of the terms cruel and unusual punishments which are banned under the constitutional amendment. It criticizes the way in which the Supreme...

  • Anti-Supreme Court Measures Now Pending in Congress.  // Congressional Digest;Dec35, Vol. 14 Issue 12, p301 

    Examines measures in Congress aimed at curbing the powers of the Supreme Court of the United States. Resolutions calling for constitutional amendments; Constitutionality of Acts of Congress; Legislative enactment.

  • Justices skeptical of ban on gay-rights laws. Walsh, Mark // Education Week;10/18/95, Vol. 15 Issue 7, p22 

    Reports that several US Supreme Court justices have expressed skepticism that Colorado constitutional amendments, pre-empting any state or local legal protections for homosexuals, can pass muster under the United States Constitution. Addition of sexual orientation to anti-discrimination...

  • The Twenty-First Amendment.  // Supreme Court Debates;Jan2005, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p3 

    Reports that the United States Supreme Court has established the proposition that States are free to adopt legislation discriminating against imported intoxicating liquors in favor of those of domestic origin. Impact of the Twenty-First Amendment; Ruling that such legislation offends neither the...

  • SAVING THIS HONORABLE COURT: A PROPOSAL TO REPLACE LIFE TENURE ON THE SUPREME COURT WITH STAGGERED, NONRENEWABLE EIGHTEEN-YEAR TERMS. DiTullio, James E.; Schochet, John B. // Virginia Law Review;Jun2004, Vol. 90 Issue 4, p1093 

    The increased involvement of the U.S. Supreme Court in a broad array of political issues has created three primary problems. The first is strategic retirements that allow Presidents to fill vacancies with a similarly like-minded judge. Second, the present system creates incentives that reward...

  • THE FUTURE OF CONFRONTATION CLAUSE DEVELOPMENTS: WHAT WILL EMERGE WHEN THE SUPREME COURT SYNTHESIZES THE DIVERSE LINES OF CONFRONTATION DECISIONS? Haddad, James B. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Spring1990, Vol. 81 Issue 1, p77 

    This article addresses the outcome of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to extend the protection of the confrontation clause to state court defendants in 1965. That holding led to unprecedented judicial and academic attention to a sixth amendment provision which previously had played a...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics