TITLE

CARB accepted the inevitable in killing EV edict

PUB. DATE
April 1996
SOURCE
Automotive News;4/8/1996, Vol. 70 Issue 5653, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on how the California Air Resource Board was affected after dropping its 1998 mandate for electric vehicles. When the mandate was ruled; Names of the seven automobile companies listed in the ruling; Price of the EV1 which is an electrically powered vehicle being offered by Saturn.
ACCESSION #
9605130192

 

Related Articles

  • GM says state rule stalls electric vehicle technology.  // Electronic News;7/17/95, Vol. 41 Issue 2074, p30 

    Reports complaints by General Motors (GM) at a "Marketability Workshop" sponsored by the California Air Resources Board that the state's zero-emissions vehicle mandate is impeding GM's efforts to make a business out of electric vehicle technology.

  • Okay, this time we mean it.  // Automotive Industries;Mar1996, Vol. 176 Issue 3, p11 

    States that the electric vehicle (EV) has been changed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Statistics shown by CARB; Why CARB wants contract in California.

  • GM EV1: Not ready for prime time. Rechtin, Mark // Automotive News;4/22/1996, Vol. 70 Issue 5655, p14 

    Opinion. States that the decision of the California Air Resources Board, to halt the 1998 zero-emissions-vehicle mandate was a good one. Views on the General Motors (GM) electrical vehicle (EV) 1; Experience of Mark Rechtin driving a GM EV1.

  • California pours $20M into hybrid voucher program.  // Fleet Owner;Mar2010, Vol. 105 Issue 3, p23 

    The article presents information regarding the 20-million-dollar assistance from California Air Resources Board (CARB) for their hybrid truck and bus voucher incentive program which expected to spur the deployment of hybrid commercial vehicles.

  • Electric dream.  // New Scientist;1/6/96, Vol. 149 Issue 2011, p10 

    Reports on California Air Resources Board's decision to forego its timetable for the introduction of electric cars. Inavailability of more compact and longer-range batteries until year 2000; Board's longer-term goal; Offer of incentives to manufacturers for introducing electric cars before 1998.

  • The folly of the AQMD's subsidized electric vehicle. Ackerman, Dick // Business Forum;Winter97, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p47 

    Focuses on various government agencies in California rushing to jump on the funding for electric vehicles (EVs). Comments of Paul McCready, AcroVironment Incorporated president, on EVs; Ways to reduce mobile source emissions; Mandate by the California Air Resources Board (ARB).

  • Shock therapy for taxpayers. Green, Kenneth // Reason;Mar97, Vol. 28 Issue 10, p17 

    Presents some lessons from the California Air Resources Board electric vehicle program on how to worsen taxpayers condition. Building a car with technology that doesn't exist; How to give lots of taxpayers money to battery makers who promise technologies that they can't provide; Building a bunch...

  • Electric cars will miss deadline, say makers.  // Professional Engineering;06/25/97, Vol. 10 Issue 12, p6 

    Discloses a consensus among automakers that they may not be able to comply with a law requiring them to sell electric vehicles in California in 2003. Problems encountered by electric vehicle developers; Percentage of electric vehicles that the California Air Resources Board wants automakers to...

  • Same old stalemate at Calif. hearing. Rechtin, Mark // Automotive News;5/16/1994, Vol. 68 Issue 5551, p1 

    Reports on the hearings at the California Air Resources Board regarding regulations for electric vehicles. Technical and marketing obstacles aired by automobile manufacturers; Fear of a development of a sub-standard vehicle; Planning assumptions from the board. INSET: What is a hybrid., by...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics