TITLE

Arbitration rules become key issue for auto dealers

AUTHOR(S)
Darin, Ann Therese
PUB. DATE
February 1996
SOURCE
Automotive News;2/5/1996, Vol. 70 Issue 5644, p34
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the importance of mandatory binding arbitration clauses in franchise contracts of automobile dealers in the United States. Grounds for appealing decisions offered by state franchise laws; Federal court ruling in 19990 that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts the safeguards and procedures of state dealer franchise laws; Automakers with arbitration clauses in dealer contracts.
ACCESSION #
9602270497

 

Related Articles

  • Franchisee's Unconscionability Claims in Court's Hands.  // Dispute Resolution Journal;Feb-Apr2007, Vol. 62 Issue 1, p5 

    The article reports on a case involving severability doctrine, franchisees and terminiation of franchise agreements. The court found substantive unconscionable provisions in contract agreements and ruled against MailCoups in its relations with franchisee Connie Nagrampa. The article references a...

  • NADA urges Congress to pass arbitration law. Stoffer, Harry // Automotive News;5/31/1999, Vol. 73 Issue 5822, p3 

    Reports on the National Automobile Dealers Association's call on the United States Congress to pass a legislation that would ban mandatory arbitration provisions from franchise agreements between car manufacturers and dealers. Provisions of the legislation being supported by the organization.

  • Dealers must understand arbitration process. Chorches, Samuel Harrison // Automotive News;5/29/2000, Vol. 74 Issue 5876, p14 

    Comments on the Motor Vehicle Franchise Contract Arbitration Act of 2000 introduced by Republican senator Charles Grassley. Issue of automobile manufacturers' imposition of mandatory arbitration; View of the author that mandatory litigation is not the only acceptable resolution process;...

  • Attorneys list dealer benefits in Arizona franchise law. Myers, Daniel; Fuller, Loula // Automotive News;5/22/2000, Vol. 74 Issue 5875, p16 

    Focuses on the Arizona franchise law governing automobile sales in the state. Impact on the Internet sales of automobiles; Requirements imposed on automobile manufacturers; Ways in which the law improve automobile manufacturer-dealer relationships.

  • IV. REGULATION OF CHANNELS OF DISTRIBUTION. Curran, Kenneth J.; HOWARD, MARSHALL C. // Journal of Marketing;Jan1963, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p86 

    The article presents U.S. legal developments in marketing relative to the regulation of channels of distribution. In reference to the operating features of marketing institutions the Blenke Brothers Co., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. case is cited among others. In reference to the relations between...

  • IV. REGULATION OF CHANNELS OF DISTRIBUTION. Werner, Ray O.; Howard, Marshall C. // Journal of Marketing;Apr1966, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p69 

    The article presents legal developments in marketing related to the regulation of channels of distribution. Regarding the operating features of marketing institutions, the case "Daniel F. Kavanaugh, also known as Dan Kavanaugh v. Ford Motor Co.," is discussed. The Automobile Dealer Franchise Act...

  • Iowa law retroactivity unconstitutional; Appeals Court upholds district court ruling.  // Franchising World;Sep/Oct94, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p32 

    Reports that the United States (US) Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit upheld the US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa's decision which ruled that the retroactive application of the 1992 Iowa Franchise Practices Act was unconstitutional. Iowa Coalition for Responsible...

  • Iowa House OKs curbs on 1992 franchising reform. Martin, Richard // Nation's Restaurant News;2/27/95, Vol. 29 Issue 9, p2 

    Reports that the Iowa House of Representatives has passed a bill that would repeal or curtail major elements of the landmark Iowa Franchise Practices Act of 1992. Criticism on the 1992 franchise law.

  • Arkansas gets tough on food franchisers. Oleck, Joan // Restaurant Business;3/20/93, Vol. 92 Issue 5, p40 

    Relates the passing of a protective franchise legislation in Arkansas that would allow franchisees to sue franchisers in their home counties rather than in the franchiser's base. Governor Jim Guy Tucker; Pending legislation placing foodservice franchisees under the state's 1977 Franchise...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics