TITLE

How palimony began

AUTHOR(S)
Jacobs, Alexandra
PUB. DATE
February 1996
SOURCE
Entertainment Weekly;2/16/96, Issue 314, p76
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the outcome of palimony claims filed by singer, Michelle Triola against actor, Lee Marvin. 1960s affair between Triola and Marvin; 1970s separation of the couple; Court decision on the case; Post-case events.
ACCESSION #
9602202978

 

Related Articles

  • The Marvin v. Marvin "Palimony" Suit: 1979. Smith, Thomas C. // Great American Trials;2003, p676 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff claims that she was entitled to half of Lee Marvin's earnings during the six years they spent together as an unmarried couple. Michelle Triola Marvin was the plaintiff in this Los Angeles, California case. Particular focus is given to Lee...

  • Co-Starring At Last Lee and Michelle share billing in court.  // Time;3/5/1979, Vol. 113 Issue 10, p24 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff Michelle Triola Marvin has sued actor Lee Marvin for 3.6 million dollars entitlement for the half of his earnings even if unmarried. It highlights several allegations thrown by Michelle against Lee including a claim that the actor lusted...

  • Man Against Woman "Palimony" suits for sums and lovers.  // Time;4/30/1979, Vol. 113 Issue 18, p25 

    The article discusses court cases related to palimony in the U.S. Singer Michelle Triola Marvin sued actor Lee Marvin arguing her entitlement to share Lee's money. The court claimed that absence of an explicit contract to show Michelle's entitlement to a portion of the property of Lee. Penny...

  • Cases.  // Journal of Criminal Law;Jun2007, Vol. 71 Issue 3, pv 

    The article presents a list of court cases.

  • Untitled.  // New Yorker;11/11/1974, Vol. 50 Issue 38, p139 

    An excerpt from "Jacksonville Florida Times-Union," is presented concerning a litigation proceeding.

  • Prop 8 appeal to be heard Dec. 6.  // Windy City Times;10/27/2010, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p9 

    The article announces that oral arguments in the Proposition 8 case, Perry v. Schwarzenegger, will be heard by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on December 6, 2010 at 10 a.m. at the James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse in San Francisco, California.

  • Court Unreasonably Refuses to Suspend Trial for Litigant's Religious Observance. Zemil, Brian A. // Litigation News;Summer2011, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p7 

    The article discusses a court case, Neustadter v. Holy Cross Hospital of Silver spring Inc., wherein the highest court of Maryland released that the court can misuse its discretion by refusing to suspend case of a litigant because of his two days absence for religious reason. It further states...

  • Plaintiff's Own Testimony Dooms Case. Rogak, Lawrence N. // Insurance Advocate;1/2/2006, Vol. 117 Issue 1, p12 

    The article presents the court case of Torain versus Labiner filed at the Civil Court in Bronx County, New York. The reason of the complaint was the plaintiff's fall from a flight of stairs at the defendant dentist's office. The testimony of the plaintiff and the defendant, and the grounds...

  • ROUNDUP. Mack, Debbi // Corporate Legal Times;Feb2001, Vol. 11 Issue 111, p74 

    Presents a circuit by circuit update on corporate cases in the United States as of February 2001. Inclusion of the New York City Transit Authority's dispute of a fraudulently procured settlement and judgment in personal injury actions; Petition by Shell Oil Co. and OXY USA Inc. for a rehearing...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics