TITLE

A Warnings About Product Dangers

AUTHOR(S)
Newman, Howard J.
PUB. DATE
March 1993
SOURCE
Marketing Management;1993, Vol. 1 Issue 4, p62
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the product liability of manufacturers and others involved in the sale of products. Manufacturers' lawsuits; Federal Consumer Product Safety Commission's regulations; Nature of warning; Continuing duty; Practical steps. INSET: About the Author..
ACCESSION #
9602150711

 

Related Articles

  • Modeling potential liability costs in large class-action cases with incomplete information. Shriner, Robert D.; Cook, Philip B. // Business Economics;Apr95, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p55 

    Summarizes techniques used to develop simulation and forecasting models to estimate the probable extent of liabilities. Costs of settling claims arising from product liability situations; Needs in claims and negotiation management; Estimation of product liability costs.

  • Politics endanger product law reform. Hoffmann, Mark A. // Business Insurance;07/13/98, Vol. 32 Issue 28, p1 

    Reports that passage of the Product Liability Reform Act of 1998 has been delayed, because of disagreements among senators over unrelated issues. Voting on a motion to invoke cloture on the bill; Details on the bill's chief Democratic sponsor's, Senator John D. Rockefeller's, decline to vote...

  • Product liability burden still expected to grow.  // Corporate Board;Mar/Apr90, Vol. 11 Issue 61, p27 

    Reports on the projected increase of the product liability burden of business despite reform efforts in the United States. Effects of the reliance of courts on strict liability doctrines in pursuing damage awards; Approaches of corporations in dealing with liability issues.

  • The crazy quilt in the courts. Zobel, Hiller B. // Christian Science Monitor;7/1/97, Vol. 89 Issue 151, p19 

    Opinion. Discusses mass torts, or trials to determine whether wrongful conduct has harmed anyone. The Mass Torts Litigation Committee, which allows state judges to meet and discuss cases; Characteristics of mass torts; Cases involving lead paint and asbestos; The delay and cost inherent in...

  • Product liability reform gets a running start in Congress. Begley, Ronald // Chemical Week;3/15/1995, Vol. 156 Issue 10, p11 

    Reports on the House approval of product liability legislation that will reform the nation's tort system. Benefits of the reform; Criticism from consumer groups; Elimination of special protection for medial materials suppliers.

  • Product liability reform progresses.  // Chemical Week;4/12/1995, Vol. 156 Issue 14, p5 

    Reports on the US Senate Commerce Committee's approval of a product liability bill introduced by Senators Jay Rockefeller and Slade Gorton in May 1995. Aim of the bill to limit punitive damages and eliminate joint liability for noneconomic damages.

  • Looking good for plaintiffs.  // Treasury & Risk Management;May/Jun95, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p11 

    Reports on the 1994 recovery rate for plaintiffs in product liability lawsuits in the United States. Volume of dollar awards; Comparison of recovery rates on cases involving transportation and industrial/commercial products.

  • The trials of product liability reform. Lindstrom, John // Corporate Detroit;Nov94, Vol. 12 Issue 11, p11 

    Focuses on product liability laws in Michigan. Restrictions on liability suits; Limitation of damages for a victim's non-economic losses; Creation of absolute defenses for manufacturers.

  • Product liability reform: What happened to the crisis? Zollers, Frances E.; Cook, Ronald G. // Business Horizons;Sep/Oct90, Vol. 33 Issue 5, p47 

    Questions why the products liability crisis became sidetracked by other issues in a relatively short period of time. Inconsistencies of state actions leading to misleading indicators; Use of litigation studies as ammunition for the product liability debate; Opportunity to link product liability...

  • Verba Sapienti.  // Reporter;Sep91, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p27 

    Discusses product liability, as it relates to a malpractice claim filed against a hospital. Importance of distinguishing the difference between a latent defect and a patent defect; Difference between the two defects; Information a health care facility should be given concerning potentially...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics