Brief Remembrances: My Appointment and Service on the California Court of Appeal and Supreme Court, 1976-1987

Reynoso, Cruz
March 2002
Berkeley La Raza Law Journal;Spring2002, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p15
Academic Journal
Relates events in the life of the author during his appointment and service to the California Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court from 1967 to 1987. Aura of celebration during Reynoso's swearing as associate justice for the third district; Aim of Reynoso to make a change in the smaller communities; Emergence into state government; Role as an appellate court judge.


Related Articles

  • Justice Arabian Joins AAA Roster.  // Dispute Resolution Journal;Apr-Sept96, Vol. 51 Issue 2/3, p8 

    The article reports that Justice Armand Arabian has retired from the judiciary, and has joined the U.S. Large, Complex Case Panel of the American Arbitration Association. Prior to his appointment to the California Supreme Court in 1990 by the state's Governor Pete Wilson, Arabian served as...

  • California Court Clarifies Class Certification Standards. Chan, Lin Yee // Labor & Employment Law;Winter2013, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p3 

    The article discusses the California Supreme Court case between the Brinker Restaurant Corp. and the California's Superior Court. As mentioned, earlier the California Court of Appeals has decertified all the subclasses of the class certification granted by a trial court. It further mentions that...

  • State Civil Litigation Notes. A. S. L. // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Sep2005, p180 

    The article reports that the California Supreme Court rejected a suggestion by all parties to pending same-sex marriage litigation to let the case bypass the court of appeal and go directly to the Supreme Court. On March 14, 2005, the San Francisco Superior Court ruled in Marriage Cases, that...

  • 'Suspect' Judgment. Keefe, Derek R. // Christianity Today;Jul2008, Vol. 52 Issue 7, p18 

    The article focuses on the implications of the decision of the California Supreme Court to overturn a state law prohibiting same-sex marriages on May 15, 2008, stating that sexual orientation was a suspect classification. It is explained that by labeling sexual orientation suspect, the court...

  • Orange Citizens: Degradation of Procedural Fairness in Municipal Zoning. Johnson, Xavier // Ecology Law Quarterly;2014, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p621 

    The article focuses on the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District's decision in case Orange Citizens for Parks & Recreation v. Superior Court that addressed issues that affects public participation in city zoning decisions. Topics discussed include land use designation, the judicial...

  • California Court: Arbitrators Cannot Decide Enforceability of Pre-Employment Arbitration Agreements.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q3, Special section p1 

    The article reports on the ruling of the California Court of Appeal in the Ontiveros versus DHL Express case which states that a provision giving the arbitrator the authority to decide enforceability of pre-employment arbitration agreements was unenforceable. It notes that the agreement did not...

  • Marriage Ban Challenged in California Supreme Court.  // Just Out;3/7/2008, Vol. 25 Issue 9, p18 

    The article reports on the hearing of California Supreme Court on the constitutionality of Proposition 22, the state's same-sex marriage ban. It states that Judge Richard A. Kramer of San Francisco Superior Court ruled that to exclude same-sex couples from marriage will constitute a violation of...

  • North Coast Women's Care: California's Still-Undefined Standard for Protecting Religious Freedom. Ajmani, Sumeet // California Law Review;Dec2009, Vol. 97 Issue 6, p1867 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff filed violation of Unruh Act for discrimination of sexual orientation in California. The plaintiff Guadalupe Benitez sued Dr. Christine Brody, Dr. Douglas Fenton and North Coast for not performing intrauterine insemination (IUI) due to...

  • California Supreme Court upholds Amwest decision.  // Insurance Advocate;12/30/95, Vol. 106 Issue 50, p16 

    Reports that the California Supreme Court made an announcement in the case Amwest versue Wilson, which was to invalidate legislative enactment of a law to exclude companies from Proposition 103 rollback obligations. Explanation from IBA West; What was the challenge of the case.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics