A PLYMOUTH, A PAROLEE, AND THE POLICE: THE CASE FOR THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE IN CIVIL FORTEITURE AFTER PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE v. SCOTT
- Federal Circuit Declines to Adopt Per Se Rules for Evidence of Conception and Reduction to Practice. Weiffenbach, Cameron K. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q4, p1
The article focuses on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding the use of evidence of conception and evidence of diligence. The Federal Circuit has rejected the rule which excludes the evidence of conception and evidence of diligence in support of an invention...
- circuit briefs. Benson, David // Corporate Legal Times;Jul2002, Vol. 12 Issue 128, p54
Reports on developments related to the law and law cases in the 7th Circuit of the U.S. as of July 2002. Lawsuit filed by a flight attendant against United Airlines; Arbitration agreement drafted by SCI Management Corp.
- circuit briefs. Rubenstein, Bruce // Corporate Legal Times;Jul2002, Vol. 12 Issue 128, p56
Reports on developments related to law and cases in the 8th Circuit of the U.S. as of July 2002. Protests against workplace genetic testing; Trade secret label; Monopoly of agriculture in South Dakota.
- circuit briefs. Jackson, Liane // Corporate Legal Times;Jul2002, Vol. 12 Issue 128, p58
Reports on developments related to law and cases in the 9th Circuit in the U.S. as of July 2002. Labor practices of Nike Inc.; Lawsuit filed against makers of three abdominal exercise belts.
- Circuit by circuit. // Corporate Legal Times;Jul2002, Vol. 12 Issue 128, p60
Reports on developments related to law and cases in the U.S. as of July 2002. 'Vacco v. Microsoft Corp.'; 'The Taubman Co. v. Webfeats et al'; 'Stella v. Mineta, et al.'
- A SURVEY OF CHANGES IN UNITED STATES LITIGATION. Weinstein, Jack B. // St. John's Law Review;Spring2002, Vol. 76 Issue 2, p379
Presents information on changes in the litigation system of the U.S. Details on substantive and procedural changes between putative defendants and prospective plaintiffs; Discussion on conflicts between states and the federal government for control of the U.S. legal system; Description of...
- Supreme Court box score. // American Bar Association Journal;Jun78, Vol. 64 Issue 6, p828
Presents news briefs pertaining to law in the U.S. as of June 1978. Supreme court's refusal to review the criminal case on the standard of lawyer incompetence under the Sixth Amendment's effective assistance of counsel provision; Different eligibility standards for political parties to put...
- FORUM SHOPPING THROUGH THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE. Boney IV, Lindsey C. // Alabama Law Review;2008, Vol. 60 Issue 1, p151
The article discusses the approach of the U.S. federal courts to state evidentiary rules of exclusion in the context of litigation brought under diversity or supplemental jurisdiction governed by the Federal Rules of Evidence. It points out the conflict between the federal relevancy rules and...
- LIBERALS, CONSERVATIVES, AND THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE. Sunderland, Lane V. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter1980, Vol. 71 Issue 4, p343
This article focuses on the factual justification of deterrence and how it affects the rule requiring exclusion of illegally seized evidence from judicial proceedings. The concept of judicial integrity with deterrence as the sole judicial rationale for exclusion emanates from a justifiable...