TITLE

Quit worrying

AUTHOR(S)
Cooper, Matthew
PUB. DATE
October 1995
SOURCE
New Republic;10/23/95, Vol. 213 Issue 17, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Refutes the notion that the verdict on the murder trial of African American sport celebrity O. J. Simpson will have a lasting effect on U.S. polity. Criticism against the charge that the jury system is infected by tribalism; Reason for the speed at which the jury deliberated and handed out the verdict; Weaknesses shown by police investigations of criminal cases.
ACCESSION #
9510155223

 

Related Articles

  • Roving camera. Gilbert, James // New York Amsterdam News;10/14/95, Vol. 86 Issue 41, p13 

    Shares opinion of several Afro-Americans on the final verdict in the O.J. Simpson case in the United States. Criticism of the charges of unfairness against the jury; Racial undertones of the case and its comparison with the Rodney King trial; Prevalence of justice.

  • The O.J. verdict: Not only Harlem rejoiced. Dickenson, George-Therese // New York Amsterdam News;10/14/95, Vol. 86 Issue 41, p13 

    Opinion. Shares the view of a White American woman on the verdict handed down in the O.J. Simpson double murder trial. Evidence as a requirement of the justice system for a conviction of guilty; Recollections of personal experiences in assessing the results of the trial; Criticisms of charges...

  • UNREASONABLE DOUBT.  // New Republic;10/23/95, Vol. 213 Issue 17, p7 

    Examines the social implications of the acquittal of African American sport celebrity O. J. Simpson on the murder case against him. Assertions of defense lawyer Johnnie Cochran regarding domestic violence that reflect gender gap; Views that the jury's doubts about the racial fairness and sheer...

  • Murder Most Foul.  // National Review;10/23/1995, Vol. 47 Issue 20, p10 

    The article criticizes the ruling of the U.S. court in the murder case involving O. J. Simpson. U.S. President Bill Clinton have stated that the jury has ruled and that their decision must be accepted. But the court of public opinion could have given a proper verdict against Simpson. It is also...

  • Where Does Fuhrman Take Us? Buckley Jr., William F. // National Review;9/25/1995, Vol. 47 Issue 17, p103 

    The article reflects on the trials of police officer Mark Fuhrman and professional football player O. J. Simpson. It assesses the implications of the court cases for the U.S. jury system. It discusses legal issues related to the police mishandling of suspect Rodney King in Los Angeles,...

  • O. J. Simpson's Latest Innocent Plea. Figueroa, Ana // Newsweek;2/28/2000, Vol. 135 Issue 9, p38 

    Focuses on a corruption scandal in California's Los Angeles Police Department. Role of Rafael Perez in starting the investigation; View of O.J. Simpson who was tried for murder in 1995.

  • WHILE WE'RE AT IT. Neuhaus, Richard John // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Aug/Sep1997, Issue 75, p82 

    Comments on an article written by Dennis Prager regarding the verdicts of the O. J. Simpson case. Results of the "New York Times" news coverage of the case; Significance of the case to the legal system and the bigoted African Americans; Views of African Americans and Whites on the case.

  • CORRESPONDENCE. Mintz, Richard; Bell, David A.; Becker, David G.; Messick, Richard E.; Knox, Diane; Amselle, Jorge; Maas, Brian; Rosin, Hanna // New Republic;11/20/95, Vol. 213 Issue 21, p6 

    Presents letters to the editor referencing articles and topics published in previous issues. "Unreasonable Doubt" which deals with the verdict on the O. J. Simpson case; "Jury Dismissed" which focused on the adoption of a continental European-style legal system in the O. J. Simpson case.

  • Beyond 'reasonable doubt': The criminal standard of proof instruction as communicative act. Heifer, Chris // International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law;2006, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p159 

    If juries are to bring in just verdicts in criminal trials, they need to understand the criminal standard of proof -- beyond reasonable doubt -- and apply it to the evidence they have heard in court. Yet courts have been notoriously ineffective in communicating that standard to lay jurors. This...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics