TITLE

Ultrasound: More harm than good?

AUTHOR(S)
Wagner, Marsden
PUB. DATE
December 1995
SOURCE
Mothering;Winter95, Issue 77, p51
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the safety aspects of the use of the ultrasound scanning by pregnant women. Effectiveness of ultrasound in pregnancy; Issue on safety of X-rays during pregnancy; Problem on exposure conditions; Lack of comprehensive assessment of ultrasound use during pregnancy.
ACCESSION #
9510154998

 

Related Articles

  • Obstetrics ultrasound: getting good vibrations. Lind, Tom // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);9/6/1986, Vol. 293 Issue 6547, p576 

    Assesses obstetric ultrasound in Great Britain. Impact of the perception on the safety of ultrasonography; Concern over increased radiation exposure time; Determination of fetal sex.

  • Ultrasound: why so little research? Robinson, Jean // AIMS Journal;2002, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p15 

    Discusses possible effects of antenatal ultrasound to mothers. Possible risks of increasing Asperger's syndrome/autism; Speech and hearing difficulties; Effects of prolong exposure to ultrasound on babies.

  • Ultracautious. Hensley, Scott // Modern Healthcare;12/08/97, Vol. 27 Issue 49, p22 

    Presents information on a survey which was conducted by researchers at the University of Michigan School of Medicine in Ann Arbor on pregnant women and ultrasounds. Information on the findings of the survey; Comments from Ella Kazerooni, a radiologist at the University of Michigan.

  • Routine ultrasound screening of all pregnant women...  // Consumers' Research Magazine;Nov93, Vol. 76 Issue 11, p7 

    Looks at results of a study reported in the `New England Journal of Medicine,' which found that routine ultrasound screening of all pregnant women does not improve the outcome at birth. Cost of an ultrasound; Details.

  • Ultrasounds: Nice, but are they worth $200?  // U.S. News & World Report;9/27/93, Vol. 115 Issue 12, p13 

    States that according to a new study of low-risk pregnancies, routine use of prenatal ultrasound screening--at an average cost of $200 a test--does not reduce the incidence of problem deliveries or abnormal babies. Findings reported in the `New England Journal of Medicine'; Estimated $1 billion...

  • Imperfect scans.  // New Scientist;05/05/97, Vol. 154 Issue 2076, p13 

    Reveals that around 40% of major fetal defects are not detected by routine ultrasound scans. Highlights of study led by Fung-Yee Chan of Brisbane, Australia.

  • Putting ultrasound to the test. Bloch, Emily // Parenting;Sep97, Vol. 11 Issue 7, p60 

    Comments on alpha-fetoprotein blood test, which is performed on pregnant women for the screening of birth defects, while focusing on the use of ultrasound. Reference to a study; Advantages of using the ultrasound.

  • Stirrup time. Colino, Stacey // Harper's Bazaar;Sep99, Issue 3454, p326 

    Presents list of the most important tests to get and topics to discuss with a obstetrician-gynecologist. High-technology Paps; Birth control; Ultrasound; Immunizations; Ovarian test; Mammograms.

  • Comparación de la medición cervical y de la línea endometrial mediante dos técnicas ultrasonográficas. Aguayo Macías, Eduardo; Eduardo Femat Villarreal, Alfonso; González Habib, Roberto; Daniel López Tapia, Jesús // Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico;Apr2012, Vol. 80 Issue 4, p251 

    Background: Cervical and endometrial measurement in the gynecological and obstetric patients is of vital importance. There is no consensus for the correct way in which should be made the measurement, more than anything is for an opinion of some experts. Objective: To determine whether there are...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics