TITLE

The rules of E-mail

AUTHOR(S)
Kawasaki, Guy
PUB. DATE
October 1995
SOURCE
Macworld;Oct95, Vol. 12 Issue 10, p286
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents rules of E-mail etiquette. File sending rules; Text writing rules; Five-to-one rule; E-mail golden rule.
ACCESSION #
9510045543

 

Related Articles

  • E-mail protocol `parts' don't add up yet. Berlind, David // PC Week;3/21/94, Vol. 11 Issue 11, PC Week Netweek pN/16 

    Opinion. Comments on E-mail standard X.400. Specified functions; Failure to anticipate the evolution of desktop's user interface; Charter to reconvene; Incompleteness of improvements; Need for technology change.

  • Vendors back messaging reliability standard. Rooney, Paula // PC Week;04/14/97, Vol. 14 Issue 15, p42 

    Reports on the support of such companies as IBM, Microsoft Corp. and Hewlett-Packard Co. for Business Quality Messaging (BQM). BQM as an initiative designed to ensure the reliable transmission of messages across intranets; The support of IBM and Microsoft of their respective middleware for BQM;...

  • Straight talk about E-mail connectivity. Myer, Ted // Business Communications Review;Jul95, Vol. 25 Issue 7, p35 

    Analyzes why electronic mail systems have too many standards. Difficulty of getting different e-mail systems to exchange messages as a result of the lack of e-mail constituency; Five areas of agreement among messaging communities; Message model; Header fields; End-to-end messaging services;...

  • Dial X.500 for global directory help. Rooney, Paula // PC Week;5/15/95, Vol. 12 Issue 19, p19 

    Looks at the importance of inclusion of X.500 and X.400 capabilities in electronic mail systems. X.500 as a standard electronic yellow pages; X.400 as a standard for global e-mail exchange. Companies will plans to support both standards in their client/server e-mail offerings.

  • Industry standard management tools are in the works. M.K. // PC Week;8/1/94, Vol. 11 Issue 30, p84 

    Focuses on the need for E-mail management standards. Directory synchronization; Storage management issues; Extension of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP); Lack of information on availability of links; Microsoft Corp. and Lotus Development Corp.

  • E-mail security choices to expand. Radosevich, Lynda // InfoWorld;09/08/97, Vol. 19 Issue 36, p10 

    Anticipates vendors' supporting two or more algorithms in relation to a standards conflict over the Secure MIME protocol for encrypting electronic mail. Process of establishing multiple encryption methods; Pricing concerns; Product offerings.

  • MIME: Multimedia messages for all. Gibbs, Mark // Network World;08/18/97, Vol. 14 Issue 33, Intranet p6 

    Focuses on the Multi-purpose Internet Messaging Extensions (MIME) standard, which specifies how messages must be formatted so different mail systems can exchange them. Headers included in a message that contains MIME-compliant parts; Standard types describing the contents of MIME-compliant...

  • Reduce the risk of losing a sale over an e-mail blunder: Four actions to avoid.  // Sales Insider;4/21/2010, Vol. 4 Issue 85, p4 

    The article presents suggestions on what not to do when sending an electronic-mail (e-mail) such as avoiding the use of the blind carbon copy (bcc:) line, being polite and courteous in replying to inquiries and writing subject lines that are clear and concise.

  • Instant messaging camps still divided. Fisher, Dennis // eWeek;12/04/2000, Vol. 17 Issue 49, p22 

    Reports the lack of unity in the standards and interoperability within the instant messaging (IM) industry in the United States. Proposals considered by the Instant Messaging and Presence Protocol working group; Frustration of IM providers over the delay in the standards process; Need for...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics