Batting .500

March 1995
Advocate;3/21/95, Issue 677, p10
Reports on legislation in New York that seeks to extend spousal benefits for domestic partners of state employees.


Related Articles

  • Tasmanian Law Establishes Virtual Equality for Same-Sex Couples. Buchanan, David // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Oct2003, p174 

    Reports on the passage of the Tasmanian Relationships Act of 2003 that gives same-sex relationships equality with married couples. Provisions of the legislation; Implication of the law's passage on the country's gay communities.

  • Conference to examine domestic partner benefits. Long, Cynthia D. // Academe;Jul/Aug96, Vol. 82 Issue 4, p8 

    Announces the holding of the third annual Conference on Domestic Partner Benefits on October 17-18, 1996 in Chicago, Illinois. University of Illinois as the sponsor of the conference; Special presentations.

  • Equal pay for equal families. Badget, M.V. Lee // Academe;May/Jun94, Vol. 80 Issue 3, p26 

    Discusses employee benefit policies based on marriage. Lack of benefits for unmarried and homosexual couples; Benefits for such unions in some universities and colleges; Benefit discrimination. INSET: The AAUP adopts a policy for its staff..

  • United Nations Human Rights Committee Requires Equal Treatment of Different-Sex and Same-Sex Unmarried Partners. Wintemute, Robert // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Oct2003, p172 

    Reports on the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Committee's requirement of equal treatment of different-sex and same-sex unmarried partners. Provision of the UN law on same-sex partnership; Technical objections raised by the Australian government against the UN same-sex partners policy.

  • Rocking the cradle. Ocamb, Karen // Lesbian News;Apr95, Vol. 20 Issue 9, p45 

    Focuses on the overturning of a policy in the state of California which by Governor Pete Wilson which made adoption easy for lesbians, gays and other unmarried couples. Limited consent; Effect of the change in policy; Details of the old and new policies.

  • Significant others.  // ABA Journal;Nov93, Vol. 79 Issue 11, p86 

    Discusses the implications of the ruling in `Stewart v. Schwarz Brothers-Jeffer Memorial Chapel Inc.,' a case on the rights of gay couples in New York (State). Background of case; Implications of ruling.

  • Benefits for gays and lesbians.  // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;6/13/94, Vol. 21 Issue 26, p12 

    Cites an article that appeared in the May/June issue of the newsletter `reality.' Lists several Ontario-based companies which have joined Sears Canada Inc. in extending family benefits to the partners of gay and lesbian employees.

  • A victory for marriage.  // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;7/4/94, Vol. 21 Issue 29, p31 

    Discusses the contents of the May 27, 1994 issue of the `Washington Watch' newsletter issued by the Family Research Council. Observations about the city of Austin, Texas, and its `domestic partnership' laws.

  • Gays can afford to relax. Woodard, Joe // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;4/3/95, Vol. 22 Issue 16, p34 

    Reports on the recognition of the legal status of cohabiting homosexuals by companies in Canada. Support for spousal employment benefits; Mechanics of availment for same-sex partners; Public reaction to Sears and The Bay campaigns.

  • All in the `family'. Sillars, Les // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;7/17/95, Vol. 22 Issue 31, p14 

    Focuses on Calgary, Alberta municipality's offering of homosexual spousal benefits to employees. Document called `Domestic Partner Declaration.'


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics