TITLE

TERROR STRUCK

AUTHOR(S)
Rubin, Peter
PUB. DATE
September 1995
SOURCE
New Republic;9/4/95, Vol. 213 Issue 10, p17
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Opposes the restrictions on habeas corpus included in the anti-terrorism bill drafted in the U.S. Senate. Claim that the Senate bill's provisions on habeas corpus are more restrictive than those adopted by the U.S. Supreme Court; Definition of federal law under the bill; Implications of the bill on rectifying wrongful convictions and imprisonment; Details on the defects of the bill.
ACCESSION #
9509051649

 

Related Articles

  • The Case for Local Constitutional Enforcement. Morris, Kathleen S. // Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review;Winter2012, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p1 

    This Article calls for the overruling of the central rule in Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh (1907) on Erie grounds. Hunter announced as a matter of federal law that local governments are powerless instrumentalities of state governments. Legal scholars have criticized Hunter for exacerbating the...

  • HABEAS CORPUS--RETROACTIVITY OF POST-CONVICTION RULINGS: FINALITY AT THE EXPENSE OF JUSTICE. Finley, Timothy // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter/Spring94, Vol. 84 Issue 4, p975 

    This article examines the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Gilmore versus Taylor and concludes that the Court adopted an unreasonably broad definition of what constitutes a new rule under the case Teague versus Lane. The Court's application of the case suggests that any time a...

  • IS THERE A FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN CAPITAL POST-CONVICTION PROCEEDINGS? Mello, Michael A. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter1989, Vol. 79 Issue 4, p1065 

    The article argues that recognition of a right to counsel in capital post-conviction proceedings is demanded by prevailing constitutional doctrine. Persons convicted of a capital offense and sentenced to death have a right to a plenary appeal to the state court of appeals. After direct appeal,...

  • THE SACRIFICE OF UNARMED PRISONERS TO GLADIATORS: THE POST-AEDPA ACCESS-TO-THE-COURTS DEMAND FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS. Uhrig, Emily Garcia // University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law;Apr2012, Vol. 14 Issue 5, p1219 

    The article discusses issues concerning a constitutional right to counsel for state prisoners in all initial federal habeas corpus proceedings based on access-to-the-courts doctrine in the U.S. It highlights the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) enacted by the Congress on...

  • In Our Own Backyard: Why California Should Care About Habeas Corpus. Schriever, Theresa Hsu // McGeorge Law Review;2014, Vol. 45 Issue 4, p763 

    The article offers information on the use of writ of habeas corpus which is a civil proceeding allowing a prisoner to attack collaterally his criminal conviction in the U.S. Topics discussed include increasing number of wrongful convictions, shortcomings in the U.S. criminal justice system, and...

  • FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS--A NEED FOR REFORM. Smith, Jim // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Fall1982, Vol. 73 Issue 3, p1036 

    The article proposes amendments to the 28 U.S. Code sections 636(b)(1)(B), 2244, and 2254(d), which authorizes judges to conduct evidentiary hearings on habeas corpus applications for post-trial relief by individuals convicted of criminal offenses, to restrain abuses in the writ of habeas corpus...

  • HABEAS CORPUS--LIMITED REVIEW FOR ACTUAL INNOCENCE. Breuer, Jennifer // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter/Spring94, Vol. 84 Issue 4, p943 

    This article examines the history of the U.S. federal habeas corpus review and argues that the Supreme Court logically extended precedent in a manner consistent with its current position on federal habeas corpus, habeas relief is to be granted only in cases of egregious procedural error in order...

  • SECTION 1983 & THE AGE OF INNOCENCE: THE SUPREME COURT CARVES A PROCEDURAL LOOPHOLE FOR POST- CONVICTION DNA TESTING IN SKINNER V. SWITZER. Carrera, Gabriel A. // American University Law Review;Dec2011, Vol. 61 Issue 2, p431 

    No abstract available.

  • HABEAS CORPUS--FIFTH AMENDMENT--THE SUPREME COURT'S COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL HABEAS REVIEW OF ALLEGED MIRANDA VIOLATIONS. Bigornia, Anthony P. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter/Spring94, Vol. 84 Issue 4, p915 

    This article examines the opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Withrow versus Williams and concludes that the case was wrongly decided. In the case, the Court held that the exercise of federal habeas jurisdiction on a state prisoner's claim that his conviction was dependant on...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics