TITLE

Comparison of Implant Success Rates with Different Loading Protocols: A Meta-Analysis

AUTHOR(S)
MeiYing Su; Bin Shi; Yan Zhu; Yi Guo; Yufeng Zhang; Haibin Xia; Lei Zhao
PUB. DATE
April 2014
SOURCE
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants;2014, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p344
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To systematically evaluate implant success rates with different loading protocols. Materials and Methods: A search was conducted of electronic databases, including The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, PubMed, SciSearch, Medline, and EMBASE, for all randomized controlled trials published between 1997 and 2011 to compare implant success rates among different loading methods. The quality of randomized controlled trials was critically appraised, and the data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Meta-analyses were conducted of the eligible randomized controlled trials. Results: A total of 26 randomized controlled trials met the criteria for meta-analysis. The quality of these articles was moderate. Eight trials compared immediate and early loading (relative risk [RR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-1.93, P = .79), 7 compared early with delayed loading (RR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.52-2.72, P = .69), and 11 compared immediate and delayed loading (RR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.52-2.72, P = .69). Conclusions: The limited evidence shows that there is no significant difference in implant success rates with different loading protocols.
ACCESSION #
95071072

 

Related Articles

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics