High court backs RH against Merriam-Webster

March 1995
Publishers Weekly;3/13/1995, Vol. 242 Issue 11, p12
Trade Publication
Reports that the Supreme Court has let stand a September 1994 ruling reversing a 1991 jury finding that Random House (RH) was guilty of infringing the trade mark and trade dress of Merriam-Webster's `Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary.' Amount to be paid by RH; Order for RH to redesign its dictionary.


Related Articles

  • Ruling against RH dictionary reversed. Reid, Calvin // Publishers Weekly;9/19/1994, Vol. 241 Issue 38, p15 

    Reports on a federal appeals court ruling which reversed a 1991 trademark infringement judgment against Random House in a dispute over the cover design of Merriam-Webster and Random House's competing dictionaries.

  • Merriam-Webster petitions high court in RH suit.  // Publishers Weekly;12/19/1994, Vol. 241 Issue 51, p12 

    Reports that Merriam-Webster Co. has decided to petition the US Supreme Court to set aside the appeals court reversal of a 1991 judgment against Random House for trademark infringement. Copying of the jacket design of Merriam-Webster's `Webster's Ninth Collegiate Dictionary'; Confusion among...

  • Random Sues Rosetta Books over E-book Rights. Milliot, Jim // Publishers Weekly;3/5/2001, Vol. 248 Issue 10, p11 

    Reports on the lawsuit filed by Random House Inc. against Rosetta Books, an electronic book publisher, over alleged copyright infringement. Premise of the lawsuit; Books included in the lawsuit; Support shown by the National Writers Union and the Authors Guild for Rosetta.

  • Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (Book). Cape, Stephen H. // Library Journal;9/1/1983, Vol. 108 Issue 15, p1698 

    Reviews the book 'Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary,' from Merriam.

  • Judge dismisses $10-million libel suit. Hernandez, Debra Gersh // Editor & Publisher;3/11/95, Vol. 128 Issue 10, p18 

    Reports on a federal judge's dismissal of a $10-million libel lawsuit against Random House Incorporated. Expansion of the protection for commercial speech about protected speech in an advertisement for a book; Details of the lawsuit filed against Random House by author Mark Lane; Claims of...

  • Appeal In RosettaBooks Case Contends 'Most Reasonable' Standard Wasn't Reasonable After All. Holt, Karen Jenkins // Book Publishing Report;11/5/2001, Vol. 26 Issue 44, p6 

    Focuses on the litigation case of Random House (RH) versus RosettaBooks. Rejection of the request of RH for injunction on the publishing of electronic versions of backlist titles; Arguments of RH on the misapplication on the precedent on the licensing rights of copyrighted works.

  • RH to appeal Collins decision.  // Publishers Weekly;4/15/1996, Vol. 243 Issue 16, p14 

    Relates that attorneys for Random House publishing company have filed with the New York Court of Appeals relating to a lower-court decision in the Joan Collins case. The notice asking the appeals court to overturn the lower court's decision about Collins' manuscript; The publisher's argument...

  • Random prevails in suit over `Case Closed' ad.  // Publishers Weekly;9/19/1994, Vol. 241 Issue 38, p9 

    Reports that Robert Groden, author of `The Killing of a President' and other books about the Kennedy assassination, has failed in a lawsuit he brought against Random House over an advertisement. Description of Groden and other authors of assassination conspiracy books a `guilty of misleading...

  • Direct line.  // Publishers Weekly;2/28/1994, Vol. 241 Issue 9, p24 

    Reports on Merriam-Webster Inc.'s withdrawal of its distribution list from ICD and directly marketing of its paperback line to wholesalers. Feedback from Tom Stanley, senior vice president and publisher of Merriam-Webster.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics