H'wood tries to think small

O'Steen, Kathleen
January 1995
Variety;1/16/95, Vol. 357 Issue 11, p1
Trade Publication
Reports on the Hollywood trend toward producing low-budget movies. Companies that made films less than 20 million dollars; Sampling of films; Major studios' poor track record in making and marketing low-cost films; Reactions of industry leaders.


Related Articles

  • WHY STUDIO MOVIES DON'T MAKE (much) MONEY. Smith, Roger // Film Comment;Mar/Apr2002, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p60 

    Gives insights on the financial aspects of the motion picture industry in the U.S. Concern on the cost of film production; Consideration of the marketing costs; Decision of several companies to reduce the number of film projects.

  • The color of money. Marks, Alexandra // Christian Science Monitor;12/18/95, Vol. 88 Issue 16, p10 

    Informs about the financial status of latest movies in Hollywood, as reported on December 18, 1995. Risk involved in the business; Statistics on the cost of movies made in Hollywood; Bureaucratic layers in the studios; Types of films being produced; Opinion on the industry; List of renowned...

  • Studios: Less $$ for movies. Cox, Dan; Peers, Martin // Variety;09/21/98, Vol. 372 Issue 6, p1 

    Reports that the film industry in the United States is in retrenchment. Strategies being used by film studios to defray the rising costs of production and marketing; Details on the operations of Disney, Warner Brothers and Sony; Comments from industry analysts.

  • The unseen business. Els, Frik // Finweek;2/26/2009, p59 

    The article discusses the issue of filmmakers in funding independent films in South Africa (SA). It features the "The World Unseen", an independent film that was directed and produced by Shamim Sharif through Enlightenment Entertainment, which shows example of a film that was made with low cost....

  • Sweetening the Deal. Gaustad, Terje // NORDICOM Review;Nov2009, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p179 

    Various forms of public funding are used to encourage national film production, and one important quality of such funding is its ability to attract complementary private financing and thus maximize the resources available for national film. When the Norwegian government restructured its film...

  • PRODUCTION. Myrick, Daniel // MovieMaker;Fall2007, Vol. 14 Issue 71, p47 

    The article provides information on motion picture production. The author inferred that reduction is important in production to save on costs, but he believed that a filmmaker must break all the rules regarding reduction to produce a film that is worth watching. He noted that the greatest asset...

  • Romania: Boom fueled by low costs. Hofmann, Katja // Daily Variety;4/6/2006, Vol. 291 Issue 4, pA7 

    The articles reports on the growth of motion picture production in Romania which is attributed to the low cost of production. Other than cost, the author mentions that the professionalism of service providers Castel Film and Media Pro is also attracting cost-conscious arthouse and independent...

  • SHARING PIX IS RISKY BUSINESS. Amdur, Meredith; Bing, Jonathan // Variety;11/17/2003, Vol. 393 Issue 1, p11 

    Deals with the co-financing trend in producing films in the motion picture industry. Reasons behind the trend; Problems with the business school-style solution in production expenditure; Research results on the effectiveness of co-financing movies as a risk management tool; Rise in film...

  • Cue the Computers. Penenberg, Adam L. // Fast Company;Sep2006, Issue 108, p37 

    The article focuses on some technological innovations in the filmmaking industry at the Star Circle Pictures filmmaking company in Virginia Beach, Virginia. The company is using the Panasonic AG-HVX200 high definition camera with memory cards to make films. By making movies with this type of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics