TITLE

Anterior Access to the Lumbar Spine: Laparoscopic versus Open

AUTHOR(S)
Rodriguez, Heron E.; Connolly, Mark M.; Dracopoulos, Henna; Geisler, Fred H.; Podbielski, Francis J.; Jabbour, Nicolas; Shirazi, Sherin K.; Genyk, Yuri; Mateo, Rod; Pak, Eddy; Cosenza, Carlos; Peyre, Christian G.; Selby, Robert Rick
PUB. DATE
November 2002
SOURCE
American Surgeon;Nov2002, Vol. 68 Issue 11, p978
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential advantages and complications of a minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for anterior spinal exposure as compared with the open technique and to quantify differences in operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirements, analgesia, and morbidity. A retrospective review was performed on all patients undergoing access for anterior spinal procedures. Demographics, operation-related variables, complications, and estimated cost were analyzed. Categorical data were analyzed using the Fisher's exact test and continuous variables were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test. We performed a total of 65 anterior spinal access procedures between February 1997 and April 2001 at our institution. Fortyfive operations were performed at the L[sub 5]-S[sub 1] level: 31 using transperitoneal laparoscopic techniques and 14 using an open minilaparotomy. Mean follow-up was 12 months (range 1-50). No significant differences between the groups were found when comparing analgesia requirements, time to resumption of oral intake, length of hospitalization, and complication rates. Statistical analysis showed that laparoscopic procedures were associated with shorter operating room times (P = 0.08) and less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.029). The laparoscopic approach was estimated to cost $1,374 more than the open technique. Transperitoneal laparoscopic techniques for anterior spinal exposure are comparable to the standard open approach and offer no substantive advantages. The overall cost of laparoscopic spinal surgery is higher compared with conventional open procedures.
ACCESSION #
9474566

 

Related Articles

  • Alternate Methods for Laparoscopic Management of Adnexal Masses Greater than 10 cm in Diameter. Ou, Chau-Su; Liu, Yung-Hsien; Zabriskie, Vinette; Rowbotham, Ron // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Jun2001, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p125 

    Purpose: We describe alternate laparoscopic methods for inspection and removal of large adnexal masses, and report our experience with 18 cases in which these methods were used. Patients and Methods: Between April 1994 and January 2000, the first author performed operative laparoscopy on 18...

  • Minimally invasive surgery gains ground. Scott, Lisa // Modern Healthcare;3/11/96, Vol. 26 Issue 11, p56 

    Discusses various aspects of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the United States. Applications; Increasing sale of minimally invasive surgical instruments; Predictions for future applications.

  • Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of reason. Burke, J.; Atallah, S.; Albert, M. // Techniques in Coloproctology;Oct2015, Vol. 19 Issue 10, p663 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution" by G. Molina and colleagues in a 2015 issue.

  • News and Notices.  // Surgical Endoscopy;Apr2009, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p924 

    The article announces several courses related to endoscopic surgery including surgical skills and advanced laparoscopic suturing, research fellowships, and live operative demonstrations.

  • Interventional Endoscopy and Laparoscopy in GI Diseases. Ebert, M. P.; Malfertheiner, P. // Digestive Diseases;2005, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p101 

    Discusses various reports published within the issue, including one on advances in surgical endoscopy and laparoscopy.

  • Complications of endoscopic spinal surgery: a retrospective study of thoracoscopy and retroperitoneoscopy. Kazuyuki Watanabe; Shoji Yabuki; Shin-ichi Konno; Shin-ichi Kikuchi // Journal of Orthopaedic Science;Jan2007, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p42 

    Abstract Background  Since 1996, we have applied endoscopic techniques to the treatment of various spinal disorders. The purpose of this study was to clarify the complications of endoscopic spinal surgery using thoracoscopy and retroperitoneoscopy. ...

  • Gallbladder Duplication and Laparoscopic Management. Horattas, Mark C. // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Aug98, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p231 

    Presents a case study of a successful laparoscopic management of symptomatic gallbladder duplication in a middle-aged woman. Review of previous reports of staged laparoscopic procedures for missed duplicated gallbladders; Vital signs of the patient; Manifestations of the disease; Advantages of...

  • Literature Watch.  // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Feb2002, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p85 

    Presents a list of articles related to laparoendoscopic and advanced surgical techniques.

  • Reply to: doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2958-8: Re: Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250). Noguera, José // Surgical Endoscopy;Oct2013, Vol. 27 Issue 10, p3931 

    A response from one of the authors of the article "Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Hybrid Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250)" published within the issue is presented.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics