TITLE

Robin Hood Has Day in Court: Verdict Out on Texas School Law

AUTHOR(S)
Albanese, Elizabeth
PUB. DATE
March 2003
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;3/28/2003, Vol. 343 Issue 31803, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The Texas Supreme Court has a number of options after hearing arguments in a lawsuit filed against the state by four school districts that allege the school-finance law contains a provision that constitutes an illegal state ad valorem tax. According to Chip Orr, former state Supreme Court clerk, the court historically has returned decisions in two months to three years. The petitioners asked the Supreme Court to allow their case to go back to trial at the district court level because a number of factors in a decision made two years ago by former district court Judge Scott McCown have changed. The lawsuit maintains that a legislatively mandated tax cap of 1.50 dollars per 100 dollars of assessed valuation is tantamount to a state property tax because it deprives local districts of setting their own discretionary tax rates. Texas law forbids state taxes without a vote of the people.
ACCESSION #
9473085

 

Related Articles

  • TAX CASE REVIEW.  // Accountancy;Aug1997, Vol. 120 Issue 1248, p85 

    The article offers an update on court decisions for various tax cases in Great Britain. In the Watton v. Tippett case, the Court of Appeal held that the conditions for rollover were not met when a taxpayer sought to rollover the gain on the disposal of part of an asset that had been purchased...

  • Existentialism And State Tax Disputes - Florida Supreme Court Rules That A Taxing Authority May Not Challenge The Constitutionality Of The Statutes Which Created It. Perry, Gregg // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q2, p1 

    The article highlights the ruling issued by the Florida Supreme Court citing that taxing authorities have no authority to challenge the constitutionality of a state taxing statue unless specifically authorized to do so. It is said that two taxpayers in two consolidated cases have disputed the...

  • Williams v Horsham District Council. Lane, Vivienne // Estates Gazette;1/31/2004, Issue 405, p147 

    Examines the ruling on the court case Williams versus Horsham District Council which deals with council taxation on tied accommodations. Details of the case; Laws and facts being disputed; Explanation for the ruling.

  • Appeal Procedure.  // Assessment Journal;Mar/Apr2000, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p59 

    Details the case Aldine Independent School District, Texas versus Baty. Reason of Aldine in filing the suit; How the court of appeals can set aside an imposition of sanctions; Threshold inquiry for the court of appeals.

  • Mass. School Funding Comes Up Short, Judge Rules. Gehring, John // Education Week;5/5/2004, Vol. 23 Issue 34, p25 

    A Massachusetts judge ruled last week that while the state has spent billions of dollars on K-12 education over the past decade and has successfully set rigorous academic standards, the state must do more to help students from low-income families in its poorest districts. The 358-page decision...

  • Man Admits Theft from Iowa Historical Society.  // American Libraries;Dec2004, Vol. 35 Issue 11, p22 

    Reports on the decision of Polk County District Court on a theft case filed by library employees of Des Moines against Corey Phelps. Incidents that led to the case; Comments from Shaner Magalhaes, chief of Library and Publications Bureau; Sentence given to Phelps.

  • Kinane v Mackie-Conteh. Dobson, Sally // Estates Gazette;2/12/2005, Issue 506, p140 

    Discusses the ruling of the British Court of Appeals on the constructive trust case of Kinane versus Mackie-Conteh. Information on the defense of the respondent to the charges filed by the appellant; Facts of the case; Reasons behind the ruling of the appellate court.

  • Appellate Courts Differ In Viewing Additional PIP. Rogak, Lawrence N. // Insurance Advocate;8/4/2003, Vol. 114 Issue 29, p14 

    Reports on the varying decision of the appellate courts in viewing additional PIP in the U.S. Details of the lawsuit; Assessment of the subrogation claim; Court judgment.

  • Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia. Eaton, Mary // Canadian Journal of Women & the Law;1990, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p276 

    In Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its first opinion on the scope of s. 15(1) of the Charter. Mary Eaton reviews the decision and discovers that many mixed messages are to be found within the interstices of the text. In particular, she identifies...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics