TITLE

Talker and Lexical Effects on Audiovisual Word Recognition by Adults With Cochlear Implants

AUTHOR(S)
Kaiser, Adam R.; Kirk, Karen Iler; Lachs, Lorin; Pisoni, David B.
PUB. DATE
April 2003
SOURCE
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Apr2003, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p390
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The present study examined how postlingually deafened adults with cochlear implants combine visual information from lipreading with auditory cues in an open-set word recognition task. Adults with normal hearing served as a comparison group. Word recognition performance was assessed using lexically controlled word lists presented under auditory-only, visual-only, and combined audiovisual presentation formats. Effects of talker variability were studied by manipulating the number of talkers producing the stimulus tokens. Lexical competition was investigated using sets of lexically easy and lexically hard test words. To assess the degree of audiovisual integration, a measure of visual enhancement, R a , was used to assess the gain in performance provided in the audiovisual presentation format relative to the maximum possible performance obtainable in the auditory-only format. Results showed that word recognition performance was highest for audiovisual presentation followed by auditory-only and then visual-only stimulus presentation. Performance was better for single-talker lists than for multiple-talker lists, particularly under the audiovisual presentation format. Word recognition performance was better for the lexically easy than for the lexically hard words regardless of presentation format. Visual enhancement scores were higher for single-talker conditions compared to multiple-talker conditions and tended to be somewhat better for lexically easy words than for lexically hard words. The pattern of results suggests that information from the auditory and visual modalities is used to access common, multimodal lexical representations in memory. The findings are discussed in terms of the complementary nature of auditory and visual sources of information that specify the same underlying gestures and articulatory events...
ACCESSION #
9467272

 

Related Articles

  • Cochlear implant and hearing aid: a new approach to optimizing the fitting in this bimodal situation. Keilmann, Annerose M.; Bohnert, Andrea M.; Gosepath, Jan; Mann, Wolf J. // European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology;Dec2009, Vol. 266 Issue 12, p1879 

    More and more patients with residual hearing on the contralateral side are becoming candidates for cochlear implants (CI) surgery due to increasing CI. The major benefits of regular binaural hearing are spatial hearing, localization, and signal source discrimination in both quiet and noisy...

  • Speech Recognition in Noise in Children With Cochlear Implants While Listening in Bilateral, Bimodal, and FM-System Arrangements. Schafer, Erin C.; Thibodeau, Linda M. // American Journal of Audiology;Dec2006, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p114 

    Purpose: Speech recognition performance in noise was examined in children with cochlear implants (CIs) when using (a) a second CI (bilateral group), (b) a hearing aid (HA) on the nonimplant ear (bimodal group), and (c) a frequency modulation (FM) system on 1 or both sides. Method: While always...

  • Combined Acoustic and Electric Stimulation. Dorman, Michael F. // ASHA Leader;3/15/2011, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p17 

    The article focuses on a review of unilateral cochlear implant (CI) patients which revealed potentially usable hearing in the contralateral ear of majority of the patients. It mentions that providing a combination of electric (E) stimulation and low-frequency acoustic stimulation (A) may help...

  • The Acceptance of Background Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Plyler, Patrick N.; Bahng, Junghwa; Von Hapsburg, Deborah // Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Apr2008, Vol. 51 Issue 2, p502 

    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine (a) if acceptable noise levels (ANLs) are different in cochlear implant (CI) users than in listeners with normal hearing, (b) if ANLs are related to sentence reception thresholds in noise in CI users, and (c) if ANLs and subjective outcome...

  • Recognition of Simulated Telephone Speech by Cochlear Implant Users. Qian-Jie Fu; Galvin III, John J. // American Journal of Audiology;Dec2006, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p127 

    Purpose: To evaluate cochlear implant users' understanding of telephone speech. Method: Telephone speech was simulated by band-limiting broadband speech stimuli. Multitalker vowel, consonant, and sentence recognition was measured for both simulated telephone speech and broadband speech in 10...

  • Separating Contributions of Hearing, Lexical Knowledge, and Speech Production to Speech-Perception Scores in Children With Hearing Impairments. Paatsch, Louise E.; Blamey, Peter J.; Sarant, Julia Z.; Martin, Lois F. A.; Bow, Catherine P. // Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Aug2004, Vol. 47 Issue 4, p738 

    Open-set word and sentence speech-perception test scores are commonly used as a measure of hearing abilities in children and adults using cochlear implants and/or hearing aids. These tests are usually presented auditorily with a verbal response. In the case of children, scores are typically...

  • Audiovisual Segregation in Cochlear Implant Users. Landry, Simon; Bacon, Benoit A.; Leybaert, Jacqueline; Gagn�, Jean-Pierre; Champoux, Fran�ois // PLoS ONE;Mar2012, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p1 

    It has traditionally been assumed that cochlear implant users de facto perform atypically in audiovisual tasks. However, a recent study that combined an auditory task with visual distractors suggests that only those cochlear implant users that are not proficient at recognizing speech sounds...

  • Audiovisual Segregation in Cochlear Implant Users. Landry, Simon; Bacon, Benoit A.; Leybaert, Jacqueline; Gagné, Jean-Pierre; Champoux, François // PLoS ONE;Mar2012, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p1 

    It has traditionally been assumed that cochlear implant users de facto perform atypically in audiovisual tasks. However, a recent study that combined an auditory task with visual distractors suggests that only those cochlear implant users that are not proficient at recognizing speech sounds...

  • Performance Over Time of Congenitally Deaf and Postlingually Deafened Children Using a Multichannel Cochlear Implant. Fryauf-Bertschy, Holly; Tyler, Richard S.; Kelsay, Danielle M.; Gantz, Bruce J. // Journal of Speech & Hearing Research;Aug92, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p913 

    Presents a study which examined and compared the speech perception performance of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children who received the Cochlear Corporation multichannel cochlear implant. Benefit of cochlear implants for children; Method; Results and discussion.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics