TITLE

Tasmania Bans GM Indefinitely

AUTHOR(S)
Lowe, Ian
PUB. DATE
March 2014
SOURCE
Australasian Science;Mar2014, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p49
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that the Tasmanian government has imposed an indefinite and complete ban on genetically modified (GM) crops. It is that a vigorous debate has been sparked by the government's decision in January 2014 to turn its moratorium to full ban. Farmers say that the moratorium gave them an opportunity to work through concerns with the community in the hope of gaining approval for GM crops.
ACCESSION #
94486132

 

Related Articles

  • Farmer's GM Attitudes Disputed.  // Australasian Science;Jun2003, Vol. 24 Issue 5, p8 

    Reports on the need for more reliable information about Australian farmer's attitudes to genetically modified (GM) crops. Limitations of the results of surveys on farmers' willingness to grow GM crops; Need for random phone poll of growers that reflects the breadth of opinions and the depth of...

  • TRIALS GET A CLEAN SLATE. Riley, Jonathan // Farmers Weekly;9/26/2003, Vol. 139 Issue 13, p8 

    Announces that farmers growing genetically modified (GM) crops in government trials have been given approval by the GM Inspectorate in Great Britain in 2003. Range of GM crops included in the inspectorate inspection; Conclusion reached by audits made on seed importers and producers.

  • How green biotech turned white and blue. Laursen, Lucas // Nature Biotechnology;May2010, Vol. 28 Issue 5, p393 

    The author investigates on the success of Argentina as one of the leading genetically modified (GM) crop producers. It highlights the rapid boom of transgenic crops in Argentina in the 1990s which critics and fans consider as a model from which other developing countries can learn. He notes that...

  • EASY CASH, BAD SCIENCE.  // Ecologist;Apr2008, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p8 

    The article reports on the amount of fund given for genetic modification research in Great Britain. Public money to the tune of £131,000 has been spent on a report that claims to have found farmers upbeat about genetic modification. The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) awarded the...

  • Breeding Sanity into the GM Food Debate. Cayford, Jerry // Issues in Science & Technology;Winter2004, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p49 

    Examines the factors which led to the debate on the safety of genetically-modified food. Opposition of biotechnology critics to the implementation of patents on plants; Direct effects of plant patenting on farmers; Threat of biotechnology to the practice of traditional farming.

  • Farmers Reject GM Canola. Parkinson, Anne; Hindmarsh, Richard // Australasian Science;Jul2003, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p20 

    Presents results of a survey on the attitudes of canola farmers in New South Wales toward genetically-modified (GM) agriculture during the period of July-August 2002. Characteristics of survey respondents; Views of respondents on scientific research and technology; Sources of GM information;...

  • 'You need a government that is sympathetic towards farmers and the rural economy. This one has been completely unsympathetic.'. Cameron, David // Farmers Weekly;7/21/2006, Vol. 145 Issue 3, p20 

    The article presents an interview with Conservative party leader David Cameron regarding the importance of agriculture and farming to the British government. Cameron discusses the attitude of the government toward farmers and the rural economy. He mentions his priorities for farmers if he is the...

  • Untitled.  // Farmers Weekly;11/30/2007, Vol. 147 Issue 22, p25 

    The article deals with the decision of the New South Wales and Victoria governments to end their moratoria on genetically modified crops. The ban was imposed by state governments in Australia in 2004 in the wake of consumer concern about the possible impacts on the environment and the food...

  • Make sure seed is GM free. Allen-Stevens, Tom; Riley, Jonathan // Farmers Weekly;4/23/2004, Vol. 140 Issue 17, p10 

    Reports on the possibility that farmers using farm-saved rapeseed and those near genetically modified (GM) crop trial sites could face stringent auditing procedures to ensure they conform to new European Union labeling laws. Remarks from Paul Ibbott of the National Farmers Union on the new...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics