TITLE

FERC Offers California Consumers Up to $3.3 Billion Refund for Power Gouging

AUTHOR(S)
Finestone, Deborah
PUB. DATE
March 2003
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;3/27/2003, Vol. 343 Issue 31802, p27
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) said on March 26, 2003 that it would order refunds of between 1.8 billion dollars and 3.3 billion dollars to power consumers in California to compensate for inflated electricity prices in 2000 and 2001. The amount falls far short of the 8.9 billion dollars officials say the state is owed due to market manipulation by power suppliers during the state's energy crisis. � While staff found significant market manipulation, that doesn't alter the commission's original conclusion � that significant supply shortfalls and a fatally flawed market design were the root causes of the California market meltdown,� the report said. State officials expected FERC to increase the refunds on that portion of the state's claim by another 1 billion dollars, said Eric Saltmarsh, chief counsel to the California Electricity Oversight Board.
ACCESSION #
9440137

 

Related Articles

  • FERC Cracks Open Competition For Grid Projects. BEATTIE, JEFF // Energy Daily;7/22/2011, Issue 139, p1 

    The article reports that the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued a rule that will make it easier for independent developers to compete with existing utilities in terms of building new power lines. According to the author, the rule specifies that customers can only be made...

  • Groups Urge Caution Over Access to Mimi-Financed Lines. Sanchez, Humberto // Bond Buyer;1/26/2006, Vol. 355 Issue 32306, p5 

    The article reports on the caution given to the United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission by the Large Public Power Council not to force municipal power utilities to allow investor-owned utilities to use their tax-exempt-bond-finance transmission lines. The use may violate tax law...

  • Can Transmission Stand on Its Own Two Feet? Davis, Kathleen // Utility Automation & Engineering T&D;Jun2006, Vol. 11 Issue 5, p42 

    The article focuses on the objective of electric utilities to establish independent power transmission in the U.S. It was stated that potential development in this technology depends on how the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approaches the problem. An independent transmission company would...

  • The Future of Distribution.  // Transmission & Distribution World;Jan2003, Vol. 55 Issue 1, p40 

    Assesses the distribution segment of the electric utilities industry in the U.S. Efforts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to create regional transmission organizations; Impact of distribution on electric consumers; Solutions proposed for the neglected electric-distribution...

  • Southern States Cool to FERC's Power Grid Plan.  // Transmission & Distribution World;Jul2003, Vol. 55 Issue 7, p8 

    Reports on the opposition to the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission plan to open the nation's patchwork electricity transmission grid to greater competition. Proposal for a standard market design to encourage electric utilities to turn over control of their transmission systems to...

  • FERC's competitive muscle: The comparability standard. Kemezis, Paul // Electrical World;Jan1995, Vol. 209 Issue 1, p45 

    Focuses on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) rule of comparability standard among electric utilities in the United States. Overview of the FERC's rule; Respect for system reliability rules; Types of transmission-pricing arrangements based on traditional principles or new pricing...

  • Oasis: Too much of a good thing? Heiberger, Carol A. // Electrical World;Jul98, Vol. 212 Issue 7, p55 

    Focuses on the ruling of the United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) pertaining to the electric power industry in the United States, highlighting the Open Access Same-time Information System (Oasis). Date Oasis went on line; Comments from Herb Yan of PECO Energy's Power Team;...

  • As Clear as SMD. Kosavanic, Lisa // Energy User News;Mar2003, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p16 

    Reports on the standard market design (SMD) proposal by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to standardize wholesale electricity markets across the U.S. Response of state electric utility regulators and legislators to the SMD proposal; Origin of the demand to restructure electricity...

  • Regulator taking new look at utility mergers. Baird, Kristen // Crain's Cleveland Business;10/07/96, Vol. 17 Issue 41, p12 

    Reports on the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) review of policy on electric utility mergers. Response to the proposed union of Ohio Edison Co. and Centerior Energy Corp.; Concerns about the negative effects of electric utility consolidation; Call for public comment on whether...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics